From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: shawnguo@kernel.org (Shawn Guo)
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 20:09:08 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: dts: imx28: Fix build warnings with W=1
In-Reply-To: <20160909091441.01b152ca@ipc1.ka-ro>
References: <1473103670-15922-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com>
 <1473103670-15922-4-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com>
 <20160908140338.GD16911@tiger> <20160909091441.01b152ca@ipc1.ka-ro>
Message-ID: <20160912120908.GA7273@tiger>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 09:14:41AM +0200, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 22:03:38 +0800 Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 04:27:50PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-tx28.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-tx28.dts
> > > index 0ebbc83..b4d4dbb 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-tx28.dts
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-tx28.dts
> > > @@ -35,7 +35,8 @@
> > >  		usbotg = &usb0;
> > >  	};
> > >  
> > > -	memory {
> > > +	memory at 0 {
> > > +		device_type = "memory";
> > >  		reg = <0 0>; /* will be filled in by U-Boot */
> > 
> > I'm curious to know if the unit-address will be fixed up or not when
> > 'reg' property gets updated by U-Boot.
> > 
> No. U-Boot does not change the unit name, when updating in the reg
> property. But that does not do any harm (for now), thus the change is
> OK.

This is confusing when people is looking at nodes in /proc/device-tree.
Why cannot we give it a reasonable default configuration instead of
<0 0>?

Shawn