public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/7] arm64: Factor out TTBR0_EL1 post-update workaround into a specific asm macro
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 16:19:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160915151905.GE9316@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473788797-10879-3-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com>

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 06:46:32PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> This patch takes the errata workaround code out of cpu_do_switch_mm into
> a dedicated post_ttbr0_update_workaround macro which will be reused in a
> subsequent patch.
> 
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/mm/proc.S               | 11 +----------
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> index d5025c69ca81..0a47632787d9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> @@ -350,4 +350,21 @@ alternative_endif
>  	movk	\reg, :abs_g0_nc:\val
>  	.endm
>  
> +/*
> + * Errata workaround post TTBR0_EL1 update.
> + */
> +	.macro	post_ttbr0_update_workaround
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CAVIUM_ERRATUM_27456
> +alternative_if_not ARM64_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_27456
> +	nop
> +	nop
> +	nop
> +alternative_else
> +	ic	iallu
> +	dsb	nsh
> +	isb
> +alternative_endif
> +#endif
> +	.endm
> +
>  #endif	/* __ASM_ASSEMBLER_H */

As a general note, it's unfortunate that we put asm with alternatives in
<asm/assembler.h>, as that's included by <asm/alternative.h>, so we're
relying on things that aren't defined yet, and users have to remember to
include <asm/alternative.h>.

That's already the case for dcache_by_line_op, so I guess that's
something to deal with another day.

Otherwise, this looks good, and I guess this wil be auto-nopped in a
subsqeuent version, so FWIW:

Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Thanks,
Mark.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-15 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-13 17:46 [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64: Privileged Access Never using TTBR0_EL1 switching Catalin Marinas
2016-09-13 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] arm64: Factor out PAN enabling/disabling into separate uaccess_* macros Catalin Marinas
2016-09-15 15:10   ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-13 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] arm64: Factor out TTBR0_EL1 post-update workaround into a specific asm macro Catalin Marinas
2016-09-15 15:19   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-09-13 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64: Introduce uaccess_{disable, enable} functionality based on TTBR0_EL1 Catalin Marinas
2016-09-13 20:45   ` [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64: Introduce uaccess_{disable,enable} " Kees Cook
2016-09-14  8:52     ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-14 16:27       ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2016-09-13 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] arm64: Disable TTBR0_EL1 during normal kernel execution Catalin Marinas
2016-09-14 16:45   ` Will Deacon
2016-09-13 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] arm64: Handle faults caused by inadvertent user access with PAN enabled Catalin Marinas
2016-09-16 11:33   ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-16 15:55     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-09-13 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] arm64: xen: Enable user access before a privcmd hvc call Catalin Marinas
2016-09-13 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: Enable CONFIG_ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN Catalin Marinas
2016-09-14 10:13 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64: Privileged Access Never using TTBR0_EL1 switching Ard Biesheuvel
2016-09-14 10:27   ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-14 10:30     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-09-14 10:36       ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-14 10:48         ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-14 20:54 ` [kernel-hardening] " David Brown
2016-09-15  9:52   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-09-15 16:20 ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-15 16:41   ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-29 22:44   ` [kernel-hardening] " Sami Tolvanen
2016-09-30 18:42     ` Kees Cook
2016-10-27 14:54       ` Catalin Marinas
2016-10-27 21:23         ` Kees Cook
2016-10-14 21:44 ` Kees Cook
2016-10-15 14:35   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-10-16  2:04     ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160915151905.GE9316@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox