linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: krzk@kernel.org (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL 1/3] ARM: soc: exynos: Drivers for v4.9
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 17:53:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160919155302.GA4447@kozik-book> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2663426.T8oUku18qe@wuerfel>

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 05:02:40PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday, September 18, 2016 6:39:46 PM CEST Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Samsung drivers/soc update for v4.9:
> > 1. Allow compile testing of exynos-mct clocksource driver on ARM64.
> > 2. Document Exynos5433 PMU compatible (already used by clkout driver and more
> >    will be coming soon).
> 
> Pulled into next/drivers, thanks
> 
> Just for my understanding: why do we need the exynos-mct driver on ARM64
> but not the delay-timer portion of it?

I think we want all of it but Doug's optimization 3252a646aa2c
("clocksource: exynos_mct: Only use 32-bits where possible") is not
ARM64 friendly. One way of dealing with it would be to prepare two
versions of exynos4_read_current_timer(). One reading only lower 32-bit
value for ARMv7 and second (slow) reading lower and upper for ARMv8.

> 
> Is there an advantage in using MCT over the architected timer on these
> chips? If so, should we also have a way to use it as the delay timer?

No, there is no real advantage... except that the SoC has some
interesting "characteristics"... The timers are tightly coupled. Very
tightly. I spent a lot of time and failed to boot my ARMv8 board without
some MCT magic.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-19 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-18 16:39 [GIT PULL 0/3] ARM: exynos: Second round of stuff for v4.9 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-09-18 16:39 ` [GIT PULL 1/3] ARM: soc: exynos: Drivers " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-09-19 15:02   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-09-19 15:53     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2016-10-03  0:25       ` Olof Johansson
2016-10-03  7:48         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-10-03 12:19           ` Kukjin Kim
2016-10-11  0:46             ` Kukjin Kim
2016-10-11  0:58               ` Kukjin Kim
2016-09-18 16:39 ` [GIT PULL 2/3] ARM: dts: exynos: DT for v4.9, second round Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-09-19 15:46   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-09-18 16:39 ` [GIT PULL 3/3] ARM: dts: exynos: pinctrl cleanup for v4.9 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-09-19 15:48   ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160919155302.GA4447@kozik-book \
    --to=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).