linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: takahiro.akashi@linaro.org (AKASHI Takahiro)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH] arm64: kgdb: fix single stepping
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:43:14 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160920084312.GF30248@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb9cf2c6-83b4-1c71-d497-67f751de9b35@windriver.com>

Jason,

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 05:29:36PM -0500, Jason Wessel wrote:
> On 09/15/2016 11:32 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >@@ -176,18 +183,14 @@ int kgdb_arch_handle_exception(int exception_vector, int signo,
> >>>		 * over and over again.
> >>>		 */
> >>>		kgdb_arch_update_addr(linux_regs, remcom_in_buffer);
> >>>-		atomic_set(&kgdb_cpu_doing_single_step, -1);
> >>>-		kgdb_single_step =  0;
> >>
> >>This is a subtle change, but I assume it is what you intended?  All the CPUs will get released into the run state when exiting the kgdb exception handler.
> >You are talking about "- kgdb_single_step = 0." Right?
> 
> 
> Correct.
> 
> >Do you think that there is any (negative) side effect of this change?
> 
> 
> Not at all.   The kernel debugger always skids to a stop, and it is more reliable from a locking perspective if the other CPU threads are released while a single CPU is asked to single step until the next "skid" for all the other CPUs.
> 
> When you do not release the other CPUs you can end up single stepping a CPU which dead locks or never exits a lock elsewhere due to what ever it was blocking on never getting freed from another CPU.

Thank you for the explanation. This convinces me very much.

-Takahiro AKASHI

> Cheers,
> Jason.

      reply	other threads:[~2016-09-20  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-21  1:13 [RESEND PATCH] arm64: kgdb: fix single stepping AKASHI Takahiro
2016-09-14 12:48 ` Giuseppe CAVALLARO
2016-09-14 14:58 ` Will Deacon
2016-09-15  7:56   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-09-15 10:41     ` Daniel Thompson
2016-09-15 12:32       ` Jason Wessel
2016-09-15 13:04 ` Jason Wessel
2016-09-16  4:32   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-09-16  7:45     ` Will Deacon
2016-09-19 22:25       ` Jason Wessel
2016-09-19 22:29     ` Jason Wessel
2016-09-20  8:43       ` AKASHI Takahiro [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160920084312.GF30248@linaro.org \
    --to=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).