linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rostedt@goodmis.org (Steven Rostedt)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/ti-32k: Prevent ftrace recursion
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:29:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160922102940.6ddfeb0e@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609221555590.5599@nanos>

On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 15:58:03 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> 
> > Currently ti-32k can be used as a scheduler clock. We properly marked
> > omap_32k_read_sched_clock() as notrace but we then call another
> > function ti_32k_read_cycles() that _wasn't_ notrace.
> > 
> > Having a traceable function in the sched_clock() path leads to a
> > recursion within ftrace and a kernel crash.  
> 
> Kernel crash? Doesn't ftrace core prevent recursion?
>

There is recursion protection, but there are some holes, as well as
calls where ftrace can't protect itself.

What triggered the bug? Just simple enabling of function tracing? And
what arch? I would like to close these holes. Although, I should add
some kind of flag to notify the user (or at least for me) that recursion
is happening, because that can really be a performance hit on tracing.

-- Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-22 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-22  7:56 [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/ti-32k: Prevent ftrace recursion Jisheng Zhang
2016-09-22 13:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-22 14:29   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2016-09-23  2:04   ` Jisheng Zhang
2016-09-23  2:45     ` Steven Rostedt
2016-09-23  2:48       ` Jisheng Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160922102940.6ddfeb0e@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).