From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM/dt: Respect #address-cells when parsing CPUs
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 17:01:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160923160151.GB22454@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31c4684aa8ef7ef210cc74da5f1b02ff2882a099.1474645829.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
Hi Robin,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 04:51:48PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Whilst MPIDR values themselves are only 32 bits, it is still perfectly
> valid for a DT to have #address-cells > 1 in the CPUs node, resulting in
> the "reg" property having leading zero cell(s). In that situation, the
> big-endian nature of the data conspires with the current behaviour of
> just parsing the first cell to cause the kernel to think all CPUs have
> ID 0, and become resoundingly unhappy as a consequence.
>
> Take #address-cells into account when parsing CPUs so as to be correct
> under any circumstances.
To be correct under any circumstances you'll also need to verify that
the upper bits (e.g. Aff3) are zero, and handle the non-zero case
somewhow.
As it stands, this can have the kernel think that MPIDR.Aff* values
exist which were never in the DT.
Thanks,
Mark.
> CC: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c b/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
> index 40ecd5f514a2..7ab113c5c818 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ void __init arm_dt_init_cpu_maps(void)
> return;
>
> for_each_child_of_node(cpus, cpu) {
> + const u32 *cell;
> u32 hwid;
>
> if (of_node_cmp(cpu->type, "cpu"))
> @@ -99,12 +100,14 @@ void __init arm_dt_init_cpu_maps(void)
> * properties is considered invalid to build the
> * cpu_logical_map.
> */
> - if (of_property_read_u32(cpu, "reg", &hwid)) {
> + cell = of_get_property(cpu, "reg", NULL);
> + if (!cell) {
> pr_debug(" * %s missing reg property\n",
> cpu->full_name);
> of_node_put(cpu);
> return;
> }
> + hwid = of_read_number(cell, of_n_addr_cells(cpu));
>
> /*
> * 8 MSBs must be set to 0 in the DT since the reg property
> --
> 2.8.1.dirty
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-23 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-23 15:51 [PATCH] ARM/dt: Respect #address-cells when parsing CPUs Robin Murphy
2016-09-23 16:01 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-09-23 16:57 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-09-26 14:25 ` [PATCH v2] ARM/dt: Respect property size " Robin Murphy
2016-09-26 15:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160923160151.GB22454@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox