From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/8] thread_info: allow custom in-task thread_info
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 18:31:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160923173143.GA29830@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrV6G2DU1d7qr=ADas7nk5a77=J6X7ezKxw2_kzdmJGDXg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 03:23:59PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2016 12:28 AM, "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> > Given all that, can we make the generic thread_info::flags an unsigned
> > long, matching what the thread flag helpers implicitly assume?
>
> Yes. Want to send the patch or should I?
I've sent a patch out to LKML [1], though if that doesn't look right I'm
more than happy for you to send a correct one. ;)
Thanks,
Mark.
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1474651447-30447-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland at arm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-23 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-15 13:49 [RFC PATCH 0/8] arm64: move thread_info off of the task stack Mark Rutland
2016-09-15 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] thread_info: include <current.h> for THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK Mark Rutland
2016-09-15 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] thread_info: allow custom in-task thread_info Mark Rutland
2016-09-15 18:37 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-09-16 10:33 ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-16 15:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-09-19 10:44 ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-21 10:28 ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-22 22:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-09-23 17:31 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-09-15 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] arm64: thread_info remove stale items Mark Rutland
2016-09-15 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] arm64: asm-offsets: remove unused definitions Mark Rutland
2016-09-15 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] arm64: assembler: introduce ldr_this_cpu Mark Rutland
2016-09-15 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] arm64: traps: use task_struct instead of thread_info Mark Rutland
2016-09-15 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] arm64: move sp_el0 and tpidr_el1 into cpu_suspend_ctx Mark Rutland
2016-09-15 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] arm64: split thread_info from task stack Mark Rutland
2016-09-21 1:26 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] arm64: move thread_info off of the " Laura Abbott
2016-09-21 10:31 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160923173143.GA29830@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).