* [PATCH] drm/sun4i: rgb: Enable panel after controller @ 2016-09-21 13:03 Jonathan Liu 2016-09-21 21:03 ` Maxime Ripard 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Liu @ 2016-09-21 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel The panel should be enabled after the controller so that the panel prepare/enable delays are properly taken into account. Similarly, the panel should be disabled before the controller so that the panel unprepare/disable delays are properly taken into account. This is useful for avoiding visual glitches. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_rgb.c | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_rgb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_rgb.c index c3ff10f..4e4bea6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_rgb.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_rgb.c @@ -152,15 +152,16 @@ static void sun4i_rgb_encoder_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Enabling RGB output\n"); - if (!IS_ERR(tcon->panel)) { + if (!IS_ERR(tcon->panel)) drm_panel_prepare(tcon->panel); - drm_panel_enable(tcon->panel); - } /* encoder->bridge can be NULL; drm_bridge_enable checks for it */ drm_bridge_enable(encoder->bridge); sun4i_tcon_channel_enable(tcon, 0); + + if (!IS_ERR(tcon->panel)) + drm_panel_enable(tcon->panel); } static void sun4i_rgb_encoder_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) @@ -171,15 +172,16 @@ static void sun4i_rgb_encoder_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Disabling RGB output\n"); + if (!IS_ERR(tcon->panel)) + drm_panel_disable(tcon->panel); + sun4i_tcon_channel_disable(tcon, 0); /* encoder->bridge can be NULL; drm_bridge_disable checks for it */ drm_bridge_disable(encoder->bridge); - if (!IS_ERR(tcon->panel)) { - drm_panel_disable(tcon->panel); + if (!IS_ERR(tcon->panel)) drm_panel_unprepare(tcon->panel); - } } static void sun4i_rgb_encoder_mode_set(struct drm_encoder *encoder, -- 2.10.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/sun4i: rgb: Enable panel after controller 2016-09-21 13:03 [PATCH] drm/sun4i: rgb: Enable panel after controller Jonathan Liu @ 2016-09-21 21:03 ` Maxime Ripard 2016-09-21 22:06 ` Jonathan Liu [not found] ` <CANwerB2pmO7AMqmE9SMR1vFFsY5jMUALGSvtd=AvpU1=_jSHUw@mail.gmail.com> 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Maxime Ripard @ 2016-09-21 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi, On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:03:04PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote: > The panel should be enabled after the controller so that the panel > prepare/enable delays are properly taken into account. Similarly, the > panel should be disabled before the controller so that the panel > unprepare/disable delays are properly taken into account. > > This is useful for avoiding visual glitches. This is not really taking any delays into account, especially since drm_panel_enable and prepare are suppose to block until their operation is complete. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160922/2c9d582c/attachment.sig> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/sun4i: rgb: Enable panel after controller 2016-09-21 21:03 ` Maxime Ripard @ 2016-09-21 22:06 ` Jonathan Liu [not found] ` <CANwerB2pmO7AMqmE9SMR1vFFsY5jMUALGSvtd=AvpU1=_jSHUw@mail.gmail.com> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Liu @ 2016-09-21 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Maxime, On 22 September 2016 at 07:03, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:03:04PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote: >> The panel should be enabled after the controller so that the panel >> prepare/enable delays are properly taken into account. Similarly, the >> panel should be disabled before the controller so that the panel >> unprepare/disable delays are properly taken into account. >> >> This is useful for avoiding visual glitches. > > This is not really taking any delays into account, especially since > drm_panel_enable and prepare are suppose to block until their > operation is complete. drm_panel_prepare turns on power to the LCD using enable-gpios property of the panel and then blocks for prepare delay. The prepare delay for panel can be set to how long it takes between the time the panel is powered to when it is ready to receive images. If backlight property is specified the backlight will be off while the panel is powered on. drm_panel_enable blocks for enable delay and then turns on the backlight. The enable delay can be set to how long it takes for panel to start making the image visible after receiving the first valid frame. For example if the panel starts off as white and the TFT takes some time to initialize to black before it shows the image being received. Refer to drivers/gpu/drm/panel-panel.simple.c for details. Regards, Jonathan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CANwerB2pmO7AMqmE9SMR1vFFsY5jMUALGSvtd=AvpU1=_jSHUw@mail.gmail.com>]
* [PATCH] drm/sun4i: rgb: Enable panel after controller [not found] ` <CANwerB2pmO7AMqmE9SMR1vFFsY5jMUALGSvtd=AvpU1=_jSHUw@mail.gmail.com> @ 2016-09-23 13:16 ` Maxime Ripard 2016-09-23 13:43 ` Jonathan Liu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Maxime Ripard @ 2016-09-23 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:03:31AM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote: > Hi Maxime, > > On Thursday, 22 September 2016, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons. > com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:03:04PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote: > > > The panel should be enabled after the controller so that the panel > > > prepare/enable delays are properly taken into account. Similarly, the > > > panel should be disabled before the controller so that the panel > > > unprepare/disable delays are properly taken into account. > > > > > > This is useful for avoiding visual glitches. > > > > This is not really taking any delays into account, especially since > > drm_panel_enable and prepare are suppose to block until their > > operation is complete. > > > drm_panel_prepare turns on power to the LCD using enable-gpios property of > the panel and then blocks for prepare delay. The prepare delay for panel > can be set to how long it takes between the time the panel is powered to > when it is ready to receive images. If backlight property is specified the > backlight will be off while the panel is powered on. > > drm_panel_enable blocks for enable delay and then turns on the backlight. > The enable delay can be set to how long it takes for panel to start making > the image visible after receiving the first valid frame. For example if the > panel starts off as white and the TFT takes some time to initialize to > black before it shows the image being received. > > Refer to drivers/gpu/drm/panel-panel.simple.c for details. >From drm_panel.h: """ * drm_panel_enable - enable a panel * @panel: DRM panel * * Calling this function will cause the panel display drivers to be turned on * and the backlight to be enabled. Content will be visible on screen after * this call completes. """ """ * drm_panel_prepare - power on a panel * @panel: DRM panel * * Calling this function will enable power and deassert any reset signals to * the panel. After this has completed it is possible to communicate with any * integrated circuitry via a command bus. """ Those comments clearly says that the caller should not have to deal with the delays, even more so by just moving calls around and hoping that the code running in between is adding enough delay for the panel to behave properly. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160923/1be13bd7/attachment.sig> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/sun4i: rgb: Enable panel after controller 2016-09-23 13:16 ` Maxime Ripard @ 2016-09-23 13:43 ` Jonathan Liu 2016-09-24 20:18 ` Maxime Ripard 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Liu @ 2016-09-23 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Maxime, On 23 September 2016 at 23:16, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:03:31AM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote: >> Hi Maxime, >> >> On Thursday, 22 September 2016, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons. >> com> wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:03:04PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote: >> > > The panel should be enabled after the controller so that the panel >> > > prepare/enable delays are properly taken into account. Similarly, the >> > > panel should be disabled before the controller so that the panel >> > > unprepare/disable delays are properly taken into account. >> > > >> > > This is useful for avoiding visual glitches. >> > >> > This is not really taking any delays into account, especially since >> > drm_panel_enable and prepare are suppose to block until their >> > operation is complete. >> >> >> drm_panel_prepare turns on power to the LCD using enable-gpios property of >> the panel and then blocks for prepare delay. The prepare delay for panel >> can be set to how long it takes between the time the panel is powered to >> when it is ready to receive images. If backlight property is specified the >> backlight will be off while the panel is powered on. >> >> drm_panel_enable blocks for enable delay and then turns on the backlight. >> The enable delay can be set to how long it takes for panel to start making >> the image visible after receiving the first valid frame. For example if the >> panel starts off as white and the TFT takes some time to initialize to >> black before it shows the image being received. >> >> Refer to drivers/gpu/drm/panel-panel.simple.c for details. > > From drm_panel.h: > > """ > * drm_panel_enable - enable a panel > * @panel: DRM panel > * > * Calling this function will cause the panel display drivers to be turned on > * and the backlight to be enabled. Content will be visible on screen after > * this call completes. > """ > > """ > * drm_panel_prepare - power on a panel > * @panel: DRM panel > * > * Calling this function will enable power and deassert any reset signals to > * the panel. After this has completed it is possible to communicate with any > * integrated circuitry via a command bus. > """ > > Those comments clearly says that the caller should not have to deal > with the delays, even more so by just moving calls around and hoping > that the code running in between is adding enough delay for the panel > to behave properly. > > Maxime > > -- > Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > http://free-electrons.com https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/drm/drm_panel.h#n34 In comment for struct drm_panel_funcs: /** * struct drm_panel_funcs - perform operations on a given panel * @disable: disable panel (turn off back light, etc.) * @unprepare: turn off panel * @prepare: turn on panel and perform set up * @enable: enable panel (turn on back light, etc.) * @get_modes: add modes to the connector that the panel is attached to and * return the number of modes added * @get_timings: copy display timings into the provided array and return * the number of display timings available * * The .prepare() function is typically called before the display controller * starts to transmit video data. Panel drivers can use this to turn the panel * on and wait for it to become ready. If additional configuration is required * (via a control bus such as I2C, SPI or DSI for example) this is a good time * to do that. * * After the display controller has started transmitting video data, it's safe * to call the .enable() function. This will typically enable the backlight to * make the image on screen visible. Some panels require a certain amount of * time or frames before the image is displayed. This function is responsible * for taking this into account before enabling the backlight to avoid visual * glitches. * * Before stopping video transmission from the display controller it can be * necessary to turn off the panel to avoid visual glitches. This is done in * the .disable() function. Analogously to .enable() this typically involves * turning off the backlight and waiting for some time to make sure no image * is visible on the panel. It is then safe for the display controller to * cease transmission of video data. * * To save power when no video data is transmitted, a driver can power down * the panel. This is the job of the .unprepare() function. */ https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c?id=refs/tags/v4.8-rc7#n39 In struct panel_desc: /** * @prepare: the time (in milliseconds) that it takes for the panel to * become ready and start receiving video data * @enable: the time (in milliseconds) that it takes for the panel to * display the first valid frame after starting to receive * video data * @disable: the time (in milliseconds) that it takes for the panel to * turn the display off (no content is visible) * @unprepare: the time (in milliseconds) that it takes for the panel * to power itself down completely */ Regards, Jonathan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/sun4i: rgb: Enable panel after controller 2016-09-23 13:43 ` Jonathan Liu @ 2016-09-24 20:18 ` Maxime Ripard 2016-09-27 14:42 ` Sean Paul 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Maxime Ripard @ 2016-09-24 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:43:55PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote: > Hi Maxime, > > On 23 September 2016 at 23:16, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:03:31AM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote: > >> Hi Maxime, > >> > >> On Thursday, 22 September 2016, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons. > >> com> wrote: > >> > >> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:03:04PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote: > >> > > The panel should be enabled after the controller so that the panel > >> > > prepare/enable delays are properly taken into account. Similarly, the > >> > > panel should be disabled before the controller so that the panel > >> > > unprepare/disable delays are properly taken into account. > >> > > > >> > > This is useful for avoiding visual glitches. > >> > > >> > This is not really taking any delays into account, especially since > >> > drm_panel_enable and prepare are suppose to block until their > >> > operation is complete. > >> > >> > >> drm_panel_prepare turns on power to the LCD using enable-gpios property of > >> the panel and then blocks for prepare delay. The prepare delay for panel > >> can be set to how long it takes between the time the panel is powered to > >> when it is ready to receive images. If backlight property is specified the > >> backlight will be off while the panel is powered on. > >> > >> drm_panel_enable blocks for enable delay and then turns on the backlight. > >> The enable delay can be set to how long it takes for panel to start making > >> the image visible after receiving the first valid frame. For example if the > >> panel starts off as white and the TFT takes some time to initialize to > >> black before it shows the image being received. > >> > >> Refer to drivers/gpu/drm/panel-panel.simple.c for details. > > > > From drm_panel.h: > > > > """ > > * drm_panel_enable - enable a panel > > * @panel: DRM panel > > * > > * Calling this function will cause the panel display drivers to be turned on > > * and the backlight to be enabled. Content will be visible on screen after > > * this call completes. > > """ > > > > """ > > * drm_panel_prepare - power on a panel > > * @panel: DRM panel > > * > > * Calling this function will enable power and deassert any reset signals to > > * the panel. After this has completed it is possible to communicate with any > > * integrated circuitry via a command bus. > > """ > > > > Those comments clearly says that the caller should not have to deal > > with the delays, even more so by just moving calls around and hoping > > that the code running in between is adding enough delay for the panel > > to behave properly. > > > > Maxime > > > > -- > > Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons > > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > > http://free-electrons.com > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/drm/drm_panel.h#n34 > > In comment for struct drm_panel_funcs: > /** > * struct drm_panel_funcs - perform operations on a given panel > * @disable: disable panel (turn off back light, etc.) > * @unprepare: turn off panel > * @prepare: turn on panel and perform set up > * @enable: enable panel (turn on back light, etc.) > * @get_modes: add modes to the connector that the panel is attached to and > * return the number of modes added > * @get_timings: copy display timings into the provided array and return > * the number of display timings available > * > * The .prepare() function is typically called before the display controller > * starts to transmit video data. Panel drivers can use this to turn the panel > * on and wait for it to become ready. If additional configuration is required > * (via a control bus such as I2C, SPI or DSI for example) this is a good time > * to do that. > * > * After the display controller has started transmitting video data, it's safe > * to call the .enable() function. This will typically enable the backlight to > * make the image on screen visible. Some panels require a certain amount of > * time or frames before the image is displayed. This function is responsible > * for taking this into account before enabling the backlight to avoid visual > * glitches. > * > * Before stopping video transmission from the display controller it can be > * necessary to turn off the panel to avoid visual glitches. This is done in > * the .disable() function. Analogously to .enable() this typically involves > * turning off the backlight and waiting for some time to make sure no image > * is visible on the panel. It is then safe for the display controller to > * cease transmission of video data. > * > * To save power when no video data is transmitted, a driver can power down > * the panel. This is the job of the .unprepare() function. > */ It kind of make my point. When drm_panel_enable is called, the content is visible, and there's no extra delay needed. If what you want to fix is that the panel is enabled before the controller, hence resulting in garbage on the screen while the controller is setup, then your commit log is seriously misleading. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160924/15933e61/attachment.sig> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/sun4i: rgb: Enable panel after controller 2016-09-24 20:18 ` Maxime Ripard @ 2016-09-27 14:42 ` Sean Paul 2016-09-28 21:17 ` Maxime Ripard 2016-09-29 12:04 ` Maxime Ripard 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Sean Paul @ 2016-09-27 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:43:55PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote: >> Hi Maxime, >> >> On 23 September 2016 at 23:16, Maxime Ripard >> <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:03:31AM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote: >> >> Hi Maxime, >> >> >> >> On Thursday, 22 September 2016, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons. >> >> com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:03:04PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote: >> >> > > The panel should be enabled after the controller so that the panel >> >> > > prepare/enable delays are properly taken into account. Similarly, the >> >> > > panel should be disabled before the controller so that the panel >> >> > > unprepare/disable delays are properly taken into account. >> >> > > >> >> > > This is useful for avoiding visual glitches. >> >> > >> >> > This is not really taking any delays into account, especially since >> >> > drm_panel_enable and prepare are suppose to block until their >> >> > operation is complete. >> >> >> >> >> >> drm_panel_prepare turns on power to the LCD using enable-gpios property of >> >> the panel and then blocks for prepare delay. The prepare delay for panel >> >> can be set to how long it takes between the time the panel is powered to >> >> when it is ready to receive images. If backlight property is specified the >> >> backlight will be off while the panel is powered on. >> >> >> >> drm_panel_enable blocks for enable delay and then turns on the backlight. >> >> The enable delay can be set to how long it takes for panel to start making >> >> the image visible after receiving the first valid frame. For example if the >> >> panel starts off as white and the TFT takes some time to initialize to >> >> black before it shows the image being received. >> >> >> >> Refer to drivers/gpu/drm/panel-panel.simple.c for details. >> > >> > From drm_panel.h: >> > >> > """ >> > * drm_panel_enable - enable a panel >> > * @panel: DRM panel >> > * >> > * Calling this function will cause the panel display drivers to be turned on >> > * and the backlight to be enabled. Content will be visible on screen after >> > * this call completes. >> > """ >> > >> > """ >> > * drm_panel_prepare - power on a panel >> > * @panel: DRM panel >> > * >> > * Calling this function will enable power and deassert any reset signals to >> > * the panel. After this has completed it is possible to communicate with any >> > * integrated circuitry via a command bus. >> > """ >> > >> > Those comments clearly says that the caller should not have to deal >> > with the delays, even more so by just moving calls around and hoping >> > that the code running in between is adding enough delay for the panel >> > to behave properly. >> > >> > Maxime >> > >> > -- >> > Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons >> > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering >> > http://free-electrons.com >> >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/drm/drm_panel.h#n34 >> >> In comment for struct drm_panel_funcs: >> /** >> * struct drm_panel_funcs - perform operations on a given panel >> * @disable: disable panel (turn off back light, etc.) >> * @unprepare: turn off panel >> * @prepare: turn on panel and perform set up >> * @enable: enable panel (turn on back light, etc.) >> * @get_modes: add modes to the connector that the panel is attached to and >> * return the number of modes added >> * @get_timings: copy display timings into the provided array and return >> * the number of display timings available >> * >> * The .prepare() function is typically called before the display controller >> * starts to transmit video data. Panel drivers can use this to turn the panel >> * on and wait for it to become ready. If additional configuration is required >> * (via a control bus such as I2C, SPI or DSI for example) this is a good time >> * to do that. >> * >> * After the display controller has started transmitting video data, it's safe >> * to call the .enable() function. This will typically enable the backlight to >> * make the image on screen visible. Some panels require a certain amount of >> * time or frames before the image is displayed. This function is responsible >> * for taking this into account before enabling the backlight to avoid visual >> * glitches. >> * >> * Before stopping video transmission from the display controller it can be >> * necessary to turn off the panel to avoid visual glitches. This is done in >> * the .disable() function. Analogously to .enable() this typically involves >> * turning off the backlight and waiting for some time to make sure no image >> * is visible on the panel. It is then safe for the display controller to >> * cease transmission of video data. >> * >> * To save power when no video data is transmitted, a driver can power down >> * the panel. This is the job of the .unprepare() function. >> */ > > It kind of make my point. When drm_panel_enable is called, the content > is visible, and there's no extra delay needed. > > If what you want to fix is that the panel is enabled before the > controller, hence resulting in garbage on the screen while the > controller is setup, then your commit log is seriously misleading. > This is my interpretation of the patch. In fact, there's nothing that says a panel must have any delays at all, so bringing up delays in the commit log is pretty misleading. That said, it seems like the panel hooks are in the right place after this patch. As an aside, it seems like (from the diff, I haven't looked at the code) the bridge_pre_enable and bridge_post_disable calls are missing, and the enable/disable calls are in the wrong place. Sean > Maxime > > -- > Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > http://free-electrons.com > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/sun4i: rgb: Enable panel after controller 2016-09-27 14:42 ` Sean Paul @ 2016-09-28 21:17 ` Maxime Ripard 2016-09-29 12:04 ` Maxime Ripard 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Maxime Ripard @ 2016-09-28 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Sean, On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:42:09AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > As an aside, it seems like (from the diff, I haven't looked at the > code) the bridge_pre_enable and bridge_post_disable calls are missing, > and the enable/disable calls are in the wrong place. You're right. I have to push more bridges support patches in the upcoming weeks, I'll take care of that. Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160928/416b0a37/attachment.sig> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/sun4i: rgb: Enable panel after controller 2016-09-27 14:42 ` Sean Paul 2016-09-28 21:17 ` Maxime Ripard @ 2016-09-29 12:04 ` Maxime Ripard 2016-09-29 17:29 ` Sean Paul 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Maxime Ripard @ 2016-09-29 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi, On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:42:09AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > As an aside, it seems like (from the diff, I haven't looked at the > code) the bridge_pre_enable and bridge_post_disable calls are missing, > and the enable/disable calls are in the wrong place. Actually, I don't even think that's necessary. The atomic helpers already call drm_bridge_pre_enable and drm_bridge_enable at the right time. So I guess the proper fix would be to just remove the driver's call to drm_bridge_enable. Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160929/7c5646a7/attachment.sig> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/sun4i: rgb: Enable panel after controller 2016-09-29 12:04 ` Maxime Ripard @ 2016-09-29 17:29 ` Sean Paul 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Sean Paul @ 2016-09-29 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:42:09AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: >> As an aside, it seems like (from the diff, I haven't looked at the >> code) the bridge_pre_enable and bridge_post_disable calls are missing, >> and the enable/disable calls are in the wrong place. > > Actually, I don't even think that's necessary. The atomic helpers > already call drm_bridge_pre_enable and drm_bridge_enable at the right > time. So I guess the proper fix would be to just remove the driver's > call to drm_bridge_enable. > Yeah, that sounds good to me. I suppose this is one of the wonderful ways that drm_bridge and drm_panel differ :-) Sean > Thanks! > Maxime > > -- > Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > http://free-electrons.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-29 17:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-09-21 13:03 [PATCH] drm/sun4i: rgb: Enable panel after controller Jonathan Liu
2016-09-21 21:03 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-09-21 22:06 ` Jonathan Liu
[not found] ` <CANwerB2pmO7AMqmE9SMR1vFFsY5jMUALGSvtd=AvpU1=_jSHUw@mail.gmail.com>
2016-09-23 13:16 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-09-23 13:43 ` Jonathan Liu
2016-09-24 20:18 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-09-27 14:42 ` Sean Paul
2016-09-28 21:17 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-09-29 12:04 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-09-29 17:29 ` Sean Paul
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).