linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: helgaas@kernel.org (Bjorn Helgaas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 3/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:25:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161013182528.GC21529@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475615720-31047-4-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>

On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 05:15:19PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> The SCI function was removed in two steps (first refactor and then remove).
> This patch does the revert in one step.
> 
> The commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> refactored the original code so that SCI penalty is calculated dynamically
> by the time get_penalty function is called. This patch does a partial
> revert for the SCI functionality only.
> 
> The commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function") is
> for the removal of the function. SCI penalty API was replaced by the
> runtime penalty calculation based on the value of
> acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt.
> 
> The IRQ type does not get updated at the right time for some platforms and
> results in incorrect penalty assignment for PCI IRQs as
> irq_get_trigger_type returns the wrong type.
> 
> The register_gsi function delivers the IRQ found in the ACPI table to
> the interrupt controller driver.  Penalties are calculated before a
> link object is enabled to find out which interrupt has the least number
> of users. By the time penalties are calculated, the IRQ is not registered
> yet and the API returns the wrong type.
> 
> Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/4/283
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |  1 +
>  drivers/acpi/pci_link.c     | 34 ++++++++++++++--------------------
>  include/linux/acpi.h        |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> index 90d84c3..0ffd26e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static void __init acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(u8 bus_irq, u16 polarity, u16 trigger,
>  		polarity = acpi_sci_flags & ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_MASK;
>  
>  	mp_override_legacy_irq(bus_irq, polarity, trigger, gsi);
> +	acpi_penalize_sci_irq(bus_irq, trigger, polarity);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * stash over-ride to indicate we've been here
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index 06c2a11..6a2af19 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -495,27 +495,10 @@ static int acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(int irq)
>  
>  static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
>  {
> -	int penalty = 0;
> -
> -	/*
> -	* Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes conflict
> -	* with PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be
> -	* use for PCI IRQs.
> -	*/
> -	if (irq == acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt) {
> -		u32 type = irq_get_trigger_type(irq) & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> -
> -		if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
> -			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> -		else
> -			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
> -		return penalty + acpi_irq_penalty[irq];
> +	if (irq < ACPI_MAX_IRQS)
> +		return acpi_irq_penalty[irq];
>  
> -	penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> -	return penalty;
> +	return acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
>  }
>  
>  int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
> @@ -886,6 +869,17 @@ bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
>  		    acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
>  }
>  
> +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity)
> +{
> +	if (irq >= 0 && irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_irq_penalty)) {
> +		if (trigger != ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL ||
> +		    polarity != ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
> +			acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> +		else
> +			acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;

This would be a lot easier to read if the trigger/polarity tests were
positive, e.g.,

  if (trigger == ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL &&
      polarity == ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
    acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
  else
    acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
      
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Over-ride default table to reserve additional IRQs for use by ISA
>   * e.g. acpi_irq_isa=5
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 4d8452c..85ac7d5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ struct pci_dev;
>  int acpi_pci_irq_enable (struct pci_dev *dev);
>  void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active);
>  bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq);
> +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity);
>  void acpi_pci_irq_disable (struct pci_dev *dev);
>  
>  extern int ec_read(u8 addr, u8 *val);
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-13 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-04 21:15 [PATCH V2 0/3] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: revert penalty calculation for SCI Sinan Kaya
2016-10-04 21:15 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: reduce static IRQ array size to 16" Sinan Kaya
2016-10-12 22:13   ` [PATCH V2 1/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: " Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-12 22:46     ` [PATCH V2 1/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: " Sinan Kaya
2016-10-13 18:15       ` [PATCH V2 1/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: " Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-13 19:36         ` [PATCH V2 1/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: " Sinan Kaya
2016-10-13 20:02           ` [PATCH V2 1/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: " Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-13 20:16             ` [PATCH V2 1/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: " Sinan Kaya
2016-10-13 21:01               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-15  3:50       ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-04 21:15 ` [PATCH V2 2/3] ACPI, PCI IRQ: add PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts Sinan Kaya
2016-10-12 19:07   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-04 21:15 ` [PATCH V2 3/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function" Sinan Kaya
2016-10-05 13:38   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-13 18:25   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2016-10-11 21:55 ` [PATCH V2 0/3] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: revert penalty calculation for SCI Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161013182528.GC21529@localhost \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).