From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar)
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 17:08:35 +0530
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] cpufreq: pxa: use generic platdev driver for
 device-tree
In-Reply-To: <1476561450-28407-2-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
References: <1476561450-28407-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
 <1476561450-28407-2-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Message-ID: <20161018113835.GB11471@vireshk-i7>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 15-10-16, 21:57, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> For device-tree based pxa25x and pxa27x platforms, cpufreq-dt driver is
> doing the job as well as pxa2xx-cpufreq, so add these platforms to the
> compatibility list.
> 
> This won't work for legacy non device-tree platforms where
> pxa2xx-cpufreq is still required.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> index 0bb44d5b5df4..356825b5c9b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id machines[] __initconst = {
>  	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx7d", },
>  
>  	{ .compatible = "marvell,berlin", },
> +	{ .compatible = "marvell,pxa250", },
> +	{ .compatible = "marvell,pxa270", },
>  
>  	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos3250", },
>  	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210", },

Isn't there a race between cpufreq-dt and the platform driver to
register first ?

Also, it seems that atleast the next two patches are required before
applying this? You need to fix the order if that is the case.

-- 
viresh