From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/6] STM32F4 Add RTC & QSPI clocks
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:29:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161019202904.GB8871@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d878b846-556d-180b-8ebf-2d06646efb58@st.com>
On 10/19, Gabriel Fernandez wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
>
> On 10/19/2016 01:51 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >On 10/14, gabriel.fernandez at st.com wrote:
> >>Gabriel Fernandez (6):
> >> clk: stm32f4: Add LSI & LSE clocks
> >> ARM: dts: stm32f429: add LSI and LSE clocks
> >> arm: stmf32: Enable SYSCON
> >> clk: stm32f4: Add RTC clock
> >> clk: stm32f469: Add QSPI clock
> >> ARM: dts: stm32f429: Add QSPI clock
> >Can the clk patches be picked without causing problems for
> >existing dt changes? Do you want an ack from clk maintainers
> >instead of us picking the clk patches up? The series has
> >intermingled clk and dts changes so I'm confused.
> >
>
> Thanks for reviewing.
>
> Normally DT patches will be taken by STM32 maintainer, but yes there
> is a dependency between patch 1 & 2, so if you push the patch 1 into
> clk-next tree you have to take also patch 2.
Let's break the dependency by making the required property
optional or key off a different compatible string. As it stands
right now applying patch 1 will cause things to break until the
second patch lands which is not great.
>
> You have to be synchronized with Alexandre Torgue.
>
>
I'd prefer zero synchronization. Please just send the clk patches
the next time and leave the stuff for arm-soc out of the patch
series. Thanks.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-19 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-14 9:18 [PATCH v2 0/6] STM32F4 Add RTC & QSPI clocks gabriel.fernandez at st.com
2016-10-14 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] clk: stm32f4: Add LSI & LSE clocks gabriel.fernandez at st.com
2016-10-19 20:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-20 7:47 ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-10-20 16:05 ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-10-14 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] ARM: dts: stm32f429: add LSI and " gabriel.fernandez at st.com
2016-10-14 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] arm: stmf32: Enable SYSCON gabriel.fernandez at st.com
2016-10-14 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] clk: stm32f4: Add RTC clock gabriel.fernandez at st.com
2016-10-19 20:45 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-20 7:50 ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-10-20 7:55 ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-10-14 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] clk: stm32f469: Add QSPI clock gabriel.fernandez at st.com
2016-10-18 14:17 ` Rob Herring
2016-10-19 20:32 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-20 15:44 ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-10-14 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] ARM: dts: stm32f429: " gabriel.fernandez at st.com
2016-11-03 16:45 ` Alexandre Torgue
2016-10-18 23:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] STM32F4 Add RTC & QSPI clocks Stephen Boyd
2016-10-19 8:34 ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-10-19 20:29 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2016-10-20 7:52 ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-03 8:52 ` Alexandre Torgue
2016-11-03 8:57 ` Gabriel Fernandez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161019202904.GB8871@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).