* [PATCH v2] ARM: imx: gpc: Initialize all power domains
@ 2016-10-21 1:28 Fabio Estevam
2016-10-21 3:11 ` Shawn Guo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2016-10-21 1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
Since commit 0159ec670763dd ("PM / Domains: Verify the PM domain is present
when adding a provider") the following regression is observed on imx6:
imx-gpc: probe of 20dc000.gpc failed with error -22
The imx-gpc driver probe failure causes several issues such as:
- When booting a kernel built with multi_v7_defconfig a kernel crash is
seen.
- When booting a kernel built with imx_v6_v7_defconfig the Etnaviv GPU
driver is not loaded due to the lack of power domains.
The gpc probe fails because of_genpd_add_provider_onecell() now checks
if all the domains are initialized via pm_genpd_present() function
and it fails because not all the power domains are initialized.
In order to fix this error, initialize all the power domains from
imx_gpc_domains[], not only the imx6q_pu_domain.base one.
Reported-by: Olof's autobooter <build@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
index 0df062d..d0463e9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
@@ -430,7 +430,8 @@ static int imx_gpc_genpd_init(struct device *dev, struct regulator *pu_reg)
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS))
return 0;
- pm_genpd_init(&imx6q_pu_domain.base, NULL, false);
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(imx_gpc_domains); i++)
+ pm_genpd_init(imx_gpc_domains[i], NULL, false);
return of_genpd_add_provider_onecell(dev->of_node,
&imx_gpc_onecell_data);
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] ARM: imx: gpc: Initialize all power domains
2016-10-21 1:28 [PATCH v2] ARM: imx: gpc: Initialize all power domains Fabio Estevam
@ 2016-10-21 3:11 ` Shawn Guo
2016-10-21 19:18 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2016-10-21 3:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:28:29PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
>
> Since commit 0159ec670763dd ("PM / Domains: Verify the PM domain is present
> when adding a provider") the following regression is observed on imx6:
>
> imx-gpc: probe of 20dc000.gpc failed with error -22
>
> The imx-gpc driver probe failure causes several issues such as:
>
> - When booting a kernel built with multi_v7_defconfig a kernel crash is
> seen.
>
> - When booting a kernel built with imx_v6_v7_defconfig the Etnaviv GPU
> driver is not loaded due to the lack of power domains.
>
> The gpc probe fails because of_genpd_add_provider_onecell() now checks
> if all the domains are initialized via pm_genpd_present() function
> and it fails because not all the power domains are initialized.
Thanks for the update. Now we understand that this is a regression
caused by power domain core change. But my question on why kernel
crashes with multi_v7_defconfig but not with imx_v6_v7_defconfig stays
unanswered.
Shawn
>
> In order to fix this error, initialize all the power domains from
> imx_gpc_domains[], not only the imx6q_pu_domain.base one.
>
> Reported-by: Olof's autobooter <build@lixom.net>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
> index 0df062d..d0463e9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
> @@ -430,7 +430,8 @@ static int imx_gpc_genpd_init(struct device *dev, struct regulator *pu_reg)
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS))
> return 0;
>
> - pm_genpd_init(&imx6q_pu_domain.base, NULL, false);
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(imx_gpc_domains); i++)
> + pm_genpd_init(imx_gpc_domains[i], NULL, false);
> return of_genpd_add_provider_onecell(dev->of_node,
> &imx_gpc_onecell_data);
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] ARM: imx: gpc: Initialize all power domains
2016-10-21 3:11 ` Shawn Guo
@ 2016-10-21 19:18 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-10-21 19:50 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2016-10-21 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Shawn,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> wrote:
> Thanks for the update. Now we understand that this is a regression
> caused by power domain core change. But my question on why kernel
> crashes with multi_v7_defconfig but not with imx_v6_v7_defconfig stays
> unanswered.
imx_v6_v7_defconfig selects GPU and VPU drivers, which are consumers
of the GPC driver and change the refcount of the pu_reg regulator.
I think we should not continue to boot in case imx_gpc_probe() fails.
So I will send a patch series with this patch and another one that
prevents the boot when imx_gpc_probe() fails.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] ARM: imx: gpc: Initialize all power domains
2016-10-21 19:18 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2016-10-21 19:50 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2016-10-21 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote:
> imx_v6_v7_defconfig selects GPU and VPU drivers, which are consumers
> of the GPC driver and change the refcount of the pu_reg regulator.
>
> I think we should not continue to boot in case imx_gpc_probe() fails.
>
> So I will send a patch series with this patch and another one that
> prevents the boot when imx_gpc_probe() fails.
So in addition to the original patch, I would like to add a second one
in the series to treat the imx_gpc_probe() case.
Option 1:
commit eb8aad1447e2227d5706dfa628bdb4c82381202e
Author: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Oct 21 11:31:06 2016 -0200
ARM: imx: gpc: Fix the imx_gpc_genpd_init() error path
If of_genpd_add_provider_onecell() fails the following kernel crash is
observed on a kernel built with multi_v7_defconfig:
[ 1.723358] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
virtual address 00000040
[ 1.731500] pgd = c0204000
[ 1.731863] hctosys: unable to open rtc device (rtc0)
[ 1.739301] [00000040] *pgd=00000000
[ 1.739310] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM
[ 1.739319] Modules linked in:
[ 1.739328] CPU: 1 PID: 95 Comm: kworker/1:4 Not tainted
4.8.0-11897-g6b5e09a #1
[ 1.739331] Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree)
[ 1.739352] Workqueue: pm genpd_power_off_work_fn
[ 1.739356] task: ee63d400 task.stack: ee70a000
[ 1.739365] PC is at mutex_lock+0xc/0x4c
[ 1.739374] LR is at regulator_disable+0x2c/0x60
[ 1.739379] pc : [<c0bc0da0>] lr : [<c06e4b10>] psr: 60000013
[ 1.739379] sp : ee70beb0 ip : 10624dd3 fp : ee6e6280
[ 1.739382] r10: eefb0900 r9 : 00000000 r8 : c1309918
[ 1.739385] r7 : 00000000 r6 : 00000040 r5 : 00000000 r4 : 00000040
[ 1.739390] r3 : 0000004c r2 : 7fffd540 r1 : 000001e4 r0 : 00000040
Instead of returning of_genpd_add_provider_onecell() directly,
we should check its return value and in the case of error we
should unwind the previously actions, which in these case are:
- Call imx6q_pm_pu_power_off()
- Set imx6q_pu_domain.reg back to NULL
Setting imx6q_pu_domain.reg to NULL in the error case is required
as it will prevent further operations on the pu_reg regulator.
This kernel crash is not observed with imx_v6_v7_defconfig because
it selects GPU and VPU drivers, which are consumers of the GPC block.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
index d0463e9..b54db47 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ static struct genpd_onecell_data imx_gpc_onecell_data = {
static int imx_gpc_genpd_init(struct device *dev, struct regulator *pu_reg)
{
struct clk *clk;
- int i;
+ int i, ret;
imx6q_pu_domain.reg = pu_reg;
@@ -432,12 +432,20 @@ static int imx_gpc_genpd_init(struct device
*dev, struct regulator *pu_reg)
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(imx_gpc_domains); i++)
pm_genpd_init(imx_gpc_domains[i], NULL, false);
- return of_genpd_add_provider_onecell(dev->of_node,
+
+ ret = of_genpd_add_provider_onecell(dev->of_node,
&imx_gpc_onecell_data);
+ if (ret)
+ goto power_off;
+
+ return 0;
+power_off:
+ imx6q_pm_pu_power_off(&imx6q_pu_domain.base);
clk_err:
while (i--)
clk_put(imx6q_pu_domain.clk[i]);
+ imx6q_pu_domain.reg = NULL;
return -EINVAL;
}
Or we can not even try to boot the kernel:
Option 2:
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
@@ -459,7 +459,13 @@ static int imx_gpc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return ret;
}
- return imx_gpc_genpd_init(&pdev->dev, pu_reg);
+ ret = imx_gpc_genpd_init(&pdev->dev, pu_reg);
+ /*
+ * If imx_gpc_probe() fails we should better not continue
+ * to boot as the SoC may be in an impredictable state
+ */
+ BUG_ON(ret);
+ return ret;
}
I am more inclined towards option 2, but would like to get some feedback first.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-10-21 19:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-10-21 1:28 [PATCH v2] ARM: imx: gpc: Initialize all power domains Fabio Estevam
2016-10-21 3:11 ` Shawn Guo
2016-10-21 19:18 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-10-21 19:50 ` Fabio Estevam
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).