linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: joro@8bytes.org (Joerg Roedel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: DMA-API: Clarify semantics of dma_set_mask_and_coherent
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:08:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161024110819.GO3541@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161021150916.0d274e9f@lwn.net>

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 03:09:16PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:26:23 +0100
> Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> > The dma mapping api howto gives the impression that using the
> > dma_set_mask_and_coherent (and related DMA APIs) will cause the kernel
> > to check all the components in the path from the device to memory for
> > addressing restrictions. In systems with address translations between
> > the device and memory (e.g., when using IOMMU), this implies that a
> > successful call to set set dma mask has checked the addressing
> > constraints of the intermediaries as well.

This is basically true when you have DMA controllers in the path from
device to memory. But it is not true for IOMMUs, because IOMMU drivers
are consumers of the dma-masks, they don't really restrict them. An
IOMMU driver knows the limitations of IOMMU hardware and counts that in
when allocating an address for a dma-buffer.

So long story short: Any IOMMU restrictions in address space size don't
need to be represented in the dma-mask for a device.



	Joerg

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-24 11:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-17 15:26 [PATCH] Documentation: DMA-API: Clarify semantics of dma_set_mask_and_coherent Punit Agrawal
2016-10-21 21:09 ` Jonathan Corbet
2016-10-24 11:08   ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2016-10-24 11:37     ` Punit Agrawal
2016-10-24 11:51   ` Punit Agrawal
2016-10-24 14:44   ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161024110819.GO3541@8bytes.org \
    --to=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).