From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:09:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 00/10] arm64: move thread_info off of the task stack In-Reply-To: References: <1476904234-9511-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <10401f46-cabc-23ec-a448-c377dbce7911@redhat.com> <20161024174840.GR15620@leverpostej> Message-ID: <20161024180941.GT15620@leverpostej> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:58:10AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 10/24/2016 10:48 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > >On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:38:59AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > >>On 10/19/2016 12:10 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > >>>[3] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/log/?h=arm64/ti-stack-split > > > >>I pulled the arm64/ti-stack-split branch on top of a Fedora > >>tree and ran back-to-back kernel RPM builds for a long weekend. > >>It's still going as of this morning so you can take that as a > >> > >>Tested-by: Laura Abbott > > > >Thanks! That's much appreciated! > > > >Just to check, did you grab the version with entry.S fixes rolled in > >(where the head is 657f54256c427fec)? > > Ah I did not. That came in after I started the test. I'll start > another run with the new version. Sorry about that; thanks for respinning! It's really crazy how broken a kernel can be yet still "work"; clearly we better tests are needed. :/ Thanks, Mark.