From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 21:49:17 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3 3/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl bindings In-Reply-To: References: <6aec73cd3b9d3dbf1085d042ec6c23f385a300de.1476971126.git-series.maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20161024194917.g5oezqc4uacsyt24@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Linus, On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 02:03:59AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Maxime Ripard > wrote: > > > The generic pin configuration and multiplexing should be preferred now, > > even though we still support the old one. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard > > Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai > > Acked-by: Rob Herring > > Patch applied. Thanks a lot. However, it looks like the first patch from this serie is missing from your tree, is there a reason for that? Also, in order to preserve bisectability, could you create an immutable branch for those sunxi patches so that I can merge the DT bits? Thanks, Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: not available URL: