From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:55:58 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 00/10] arm64: move thread_info off of the task stack In-Reply-To: <2db24d48-3a8a-11c2-9b2c-26a51a3baa36@redhat.com> References: <1476904234-9511-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <10401f46-cabc-23ec-a448-c377dbce7911@redhat.com> <20161024174840.GR15620@leverpostej> <20161024180941.GT15620@leverpostej> <2db24d48-3a8a-11c2-9b2c-26a51a3baa36@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20161026095557.GA19965@leverpostej> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 05:46:39PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 10/24/2016 11:09 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > >On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:58:10AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > >>On 10/24/2016 10:48 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > >>>On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:38:59AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > >>>>On 10/19/2016 12:10 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > >>>>>[3] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/log/?h=arm64/ti-stack-split > >>> > >>>>I pulled the arm64/ti-stack-split branch on top of a Fedora > >>>>tree and ran back-to-back kernel RPM builds for a long weekend. > >>>>It's still going as of this morning so you can take that as a > >>>> > >>>>Tested-by: Laura Abbott > >>> > >>>Thanks! That's much appreciated! > >>> > >>>Just to check, did you grab the version with entry.S fixes rolled in > >>>(where the head is 657f54256c427fec)? > >> > >>Ah I did not. That came in after I started the test. I'll start > >>another run with the new version. > > > >Sorry about that; thanks for respinning! > While not as long running, I gave it another spin and it seemed to > work fine as well. Thanks, that's much appreciated! I've applied your Tested-by to the series. Thanks, Mark.