From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland) Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:32:05 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 2/9] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add DT binding for meson GPIO interrupt controller In-Reply-To: <20161026214234.4q6wmecehqh6q32o@rob-hp-laptop> References: <1476890480-8884-1-git-send-email-jbrunet@baylibre.com> <1476890480-8884-3-git-send-email-jbrunet@baylibre.com> <20161026214234.4q6wmecehqh6q32o@rob-hp-laptop> Message-ID: <20161027093205.GA27135@leverpostej> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 04:42:35PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 05:21:13PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote: > > > > This commit adds the device tree bindings description for Amlogic's GPIO > > interrupt controller available on the meson8, meson8b and gxbb SoC families > > > > Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet > > --- > > Rob, I did not include the Ack you gave for the RFC as bindings have slightly > > changed. Only the interrupt property has be removed following a discussion I > > had with Marc > > As Mark R already said, you should keep the interrupts property. To be clear, the interrupt routing should be described *somehow*, though I don't think the generic interrupts property is correct, as this is an interrupt *router*, i.e. this device doesn't own the interrupt, it just joins two parts of the line together (and so flags are meaningless). Thanks, Mark.