From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: krzk@kernel.org (Krzysztof Kozlowski) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 20:41:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 10/13] ARM: dts: exynos: replace to "max-frequecy" instead of "clock-freq-min-max" In-Reply-To: <20161103062135.10697-11-jh80.chung@samsung.com> References: <20161103062135.10697-1-jh80.chung@samsung.com> <20161103062135.10697-11-jh80.chung@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20161103184112.GB11071@kozik-lap> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:21:32PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > In drivers/mmc/core/host.c, there is "max-frequency" property. > It should be same behavior. So Use the "max-frequency" instead of > "clock-freq-min-max". > > Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5-eval.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-monk.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-rinato.dts | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) This looks totally independent to rest of patches so it can be applied separately without any functional impact (except lack of minimum frequency). Is that correct? Best regards, Krzysztof