From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: fix the bugs found in the hugetlb test
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 14:09:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161108140909.GF29087@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1478583879-14654-1-git-send-email-shijie.huang@arm.com>
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 01:44:37PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> (3) The test result in the Softiron and Juno-r1 boards:
>
> This detail test result shows below (both the "make func" & "make stress"):
>
> 4KB granule:
>
> 1.1) PTE + Contiguous bit : 4K x 16 = 64K (per huge page size)
> Test result : PASS
>
> 1.2) PMD : 2M x 1 = 2M (per huge page size)
> Test result : PASS
>
> 1.3) PMD + Contiguous bit : 2M x 16 = 32M (per huge page size)
> Test result : PASS
>
> 64KB granule:
>
> 3.1) PTE + Contiguous bit : 64K x 32 = 2M (per huge page size)
> Test result : PASS
>
> 3.2) PMD + Contiguous bit : 512M x 32 = 16G (per huge page size)
> Test result : no hardware to support this test
Don't we have support for single (non-contiguous) PMD huge page with 64K
pages (512M per huge page)? I gave it a try and it seems to work (though
without your patches applied ;)).
> Huang Shijie (2):
> arm64: hugetlb: remove the wrong pmd check in find_num_contig()
> arm64: hugetlb: fix the wrong address for several functions
For these patches:
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
I'm not sure whether Will plans to push them into 4.9. AFAICT, the
contiguous huge pages never worked properly, so we may not count it as a
regression but a new feature. If Will doesn't take them, I'll queue the
patches for 4.10.
BTW, I think we also need to fix this (no functional change though):
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
index 2e49bd252fe7..0a4c97b618ec 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ __setup("hugepagesz=", setup_hugepagesz);
static __init int add_default_hugepagesz(void)
{
if (size_to_hstate(CONT_PTES * PAGE_SIZE) == NULL)
- hugetlb_add_hstate(CONT_PMD_SHIFT);
+ hugetlb_add_hstate(CONT_PTE_SHIFT);
return 0;
}
arch_initcall(add_default_hugepagesz);
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-08 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-08 5:44 [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: fix the bugs found in the hugetlb test Huang Shijie
2016-11-08 5:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: hugetlb: remove the wrong pmd check in find_num_contig() Huang Shijie
2016-11-08 5:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: hugetlb: fix the wrong address for several functions Huang Shijie
2016-11-08 14:09 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2016-11-08 16:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: fix the bugs found in the hugetlb test Will Deacon
2016-11-09 1:42 ` Huang Shijie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161108140909.GF29087@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).