From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: KASAN & the vmalloc area
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 10:56:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161109105624.GA17020@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+ZSgfK-=wFFswMmQ+636Arz4kgwxdxz+FvEJHXvjZ8ckg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 02:09:27PM -0800, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> > When KASAN is selected, we allocate shadow for the whole vmalloc area,
> > using common zero pte, pmd, pud tables. Walking over these in the ptdump
> > code takes a *very* long time (I've seen up to 15 minutes with
> > KASAN_OUTLINE enabled). For DEBUG_WX [3], this means boot hangs for that
> > long, too.
[...]
> I've seen the same iteration slowness problem on x86 with
> CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA which walks all pages. The is about 1 minute, but
> it is enough to trigger rcu stall warning.
Interesting; do you know where that happens? I can't spot any obvious
case where we'd have to walk all the page tables for DEBUG_RODATA.
> The zero pud and vmalloc-ed stacks looks like different problems.
> To overcome the slowness we could map zero shadow for vmalloc area lazily.
> However for vmalloc-ed stacks we need to map actual memory, because
> stack instrumentation will read/write into the shadow.
Sure. The point I was trying to make is that there' be fewer page tables
to walk (unless the vmalloc area was exhausted), assuming we also lazily
mapped the common zero shadow for the vmalloc area.
> One downside here is that vmalloc shadow can be as large as 1:1 (if we
> allocate 1 page in vmalloc area we need to allocate 1 page for
> shadow).
I thought per prior discussion we'd only need to allocate new pages for
the stacks in the vmalloc region, and we could re-use the zero pages?
... or are you trying to quantify the cost of the page tables?
> Re slowness: could we just skip the KASAN zero puds (the top level)
> while walking? Can they be interesting for anybody?
They're interesting for the ptdump case (which allows privileged users
to dump the tables via /sys/kernel/debug/kernel_page_tables). I've seen
25+ minute hangs there.
> We can just pretend that they are not there. Looks like a trivial
> solution for the problem at hand.
For the boot time hang it's option. Though I'd prefer that the sanity
checks applied to all of tables, shadow regions included.
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-09 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-08 19:03 KASAN & the vmalloc area Mark Rutland
2016-11-08 22:09 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-11-09 10:56 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-11-09 18:16 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-11-09 18:30 ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-09 18:42 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-11-09 16:53 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-11-09 18:19 ` Dmitry Vyukov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161109105624.GA17020@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox