From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shawnguo@kernel.org (Shawn Guo) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:33:48 +0800 Subject: [RESEND][PATCH 6/6] arm64: Add DTS support for FSL's LS2088A SoC In-Reply-To: <1478597664-14799-7-git-send-email-abhimanyu.saini@nxp.com> References: <1478597664-14799-1-git-send-email-abhimanyu.saini@nxp.com> <1478597664-14799-7-git-send-email-abhimanyu.saini@nxp.com> Message-ID: <20161114063346.GH3310@dragon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:04:24PM +0530, Abhimanyu Saini wrote: > This patch adds the device tree support for FSL LS2088A SoC based on > ARMv8 architecture. > > Following levels of DTSI/DTS files have been created for the LS2088A > SoC family: > > - fsl-ls2088a.dtsi: > DTS-Include file for FSL LS2088A SoC. > > - fsl-ls2088a-qds.dts: > DTS file for FSL LS2088A QDS board. > > - fsl-ls2088a-rdb.dts: > DTS file for FSL LS2088A RDB board. I compared the following files. fsl-ls2088a.dtsi vs. fsl-ls2080a.dtsi fsl-ls2088a-qds.dtsi vs. fsl-ls2080a-qds.dtsi fsl-ls2088a-rdb.dtsi vs. fsl-ls2080a-rdb.dtsi They are basically identical except a couple of small changes. Can we do something to have these SoCs share the dts files at some level to avoid maintaining duplicated files? Shawn > Signed-off-by: Priyanka Jain > Signed-off-by: Ashish Kumar > Signed-off-by: Abhimanyu Saini > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile | 2 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2088a-qds.dts | 211 +++++++ > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2088a-rdb.dts | 166 +++++ > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2088a.dtsi | 703 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 1082 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2088a-qds.dts > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2088a-rdb.dts > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2088a.dtsi