From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 09:59:04 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] soc: sunxi: make sunxi_sram explicitly non-modular In-Reply-To: <20161113190302.18099-2-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> References: <20161113190302.18099-1-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20161113190302.18099-2-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Message-ID: <20161114085904.4r7ugapbvhhlz5te@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 02:03:00PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: > > drivers/soc/sunxi/Kconfig:config SUNXI_SRAM > drivers/soc/sunxi/Kconfig: bool > > ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. > > Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that > when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only. > > Since module_platform_driver() uses the same init level priority as > builtin_platform_driver() the init ordering remains unchanged with > this commit. > > Also note that MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE is a no-op for non-modular code. > > We also delete the MODULE_LICENSE tag etc. since all that information > is already contained at the top of the file in the comments. > > Cc: Maxime Ripard > Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker Acked-by: Maxime Ripard Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: not available URL: