From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jszhang@marvell.com (Jisheng Zhang) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:12:51 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 01/16] ARM: scu: Provide support for parsing SCU device node to enable SCU In-Reply-To: <1479099731-28108-2-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> References: <1479099731-28108-1-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <1479099731-28108-2-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20161114141251.7ea86e7a@xhacker> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Pankaj, On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:31:56 +0530 Pankaj Dubey wrote: > Many platforms are duplicating code for enabling SCU, lets add > common code to enable SCU by parsing SCU device node so the duplication > in each platform can be avoided. > > CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski > CC: Jisheng Zhang > CC: Russell King > CC: Dinh Nguyen > CC: Patrice Chotard > CC: Linus Walleij > CC: Liviu Dudau > CC: Ray Jui > CC: Stephen Warren > CC: Heiko Stuebner > CC: Shawn Guo > CC: Michal Simek > CC: Wei Xu > CC: Andrew Lunn > CC: Jun Nie > Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey > --- > arch/arm/include/asm/smp_scu.h | 4 +++ > arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp_scu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp_scu.h > index bfe163c..fdeec07 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp_scu.h > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp_scu.h > @@ -39,8 +39,12 @@ static inline int scu_power_mode(void __iomem *scu_base, unsigned int mode) > > #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_SCU) > void scu_enable(void __iomem *scu_base); > +void __iomem *of_scu_get_base(void); > +int of_scu_enable(void); > #else > static inline void scu_enable(void __iomem *scu_base) {} > +static inline void __iomem *of_scu_get_base(void) {return NULL; } > +static inline int of_scu_enable(void) {return 0; } > #endif > > #endif > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c > index 72f9241..d0ac3ed 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ > */ > #include > #include > +#include > > #include > #include > @@ -70,6 +71,61 @@ void scu_enable(void __iomem *scu_base) > */ > flush_cache_all(); > } > + > +static const struct of_device_id scu_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-scu", }, > + { .compatible = "arm,cortex-a5-scu", }, > + { } > +}; > + > +/* > + * Helper API to get SCU base address > + * In case platform DT do not have SCU node, or iomap fails > + * this call will fallback and will try to map via call to > + * scu_a9_get_base. > + * This will return ownership of scu_base to the caller > + */ > +void __iomem *of_scu_get_base(void) > +{ > + unsigned long base = 0; > + struct device_node *np; > + void __iomem *scu_base; > + > + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, scu_match); could we check np before calling of_iomap()? > + scu_base = of_iomap(np, 0); > + of_node_put(np); > + if (!scu_base) { > + pr_err("%s failed to map scu_base via DT\n", __func__); For non-ca5, non-ca9 based SoCs, we'll see this error msg. We understand what does it mean, but it may confuse normal users. In current version, berlin doesn't complain like this for non-ca9 SoCs > + if (scu_a9_has_base()) { > + base = scu_a9_get_base(); > + scu_base = ioremap(base, SZ_4K); > + } > + if (!scu_base) { > + pr_err("%s failed to map scu_base\n", __func__); ditto > + return IOMEM_ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > + } > + } > + return scu_base; > +} > + > +/* > + * Enable SCU via mapping scu_base DT > + * If scu_base mapped successfully scu will be enabled and in case of > + * failure if will return non-zero error code > + */ > +int of_scu_enable(void) > +{ > + void __iomem *scu_base; > + > + scu_base = of_scu_get_base(); > + if (!IS_ERR(scu_base)) { > + scu_enable(scu_base); > + iounmap(scu_base); > + return 0; > + } > + return PTR_ERR(scu_base); > +} > + > #endif > > /*