From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jszhang@marvell.com (Jisheng Zhang) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:47:06 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 01/16] ARM: scu: Provide support for parsing SCU device node to enable SCU In-Reply-To: <20161114145459.63c23391@xhacker> References: <1479099731-28108-1-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <1479099731-28108-2-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <20161114141251.7ea86e7a@xhacker> <20161114145459.63c23391@xhacker> Message-ID: <20161114164706.02545789@xhacker> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Pankaj, On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:54:59 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote: > On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:12:51 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > > Hi Pankaj, > > > > On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:31:56 +0530 Pankaj Dubey wrote: > > > > > Many platforms are duplicating code for enabling SCU, lets add > > > common code to enable SCU by parsing SCU device node so the duplication > > > in each platform can be avoided. > > > > > > CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > > CC: Jisheng Zhang > > > CC: Russell King > > > CC: Dinh Nguyen > > > CC: Patrice Chotard > > > CC: Linus Walleij > > > CC: Liviu Dudau > > > CC: Ray Jui > > > CC: Stephen Warren > > > CC: Heiko Stuebner > > > CC: Shawn Guo > > > CC: Michal Simek > > > CC: Wei Xu > > > CC: Andrew Lunn > > > CC: Jun Nie > > > Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann > > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey > > > --- > > > arch/arm/include/asm/smp_scu.h | 4 +++ > > > arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp_scu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp_scu.h > > > index bfe163c..fdeec07 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp_scu.h > > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp_scu.h > > > @@ -39,8 +39,12 @@ static inline int scu_power_mode(void __iomem *scu_base, unsigned int mode) > > > > > > #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_SCU) > > > void scu_enable(void __iomem *scu_base); > > > +void __iomem *of_scu_get_base(void); > > > +int of_scu_enable(void); > > > #else > > > static inline void scu_enable(void __iomem *scu_base) {} > > > +static inline void __iomem *of_scu_get_base(void) {return NULL; } > > > +static inline int of_scu_enable(void) {return 0; } > > > #endif > > > > > > #endif > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c > > > index 72f9241..d0ac3ed 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c > > > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ > > > */ > > > #include > > > #include > > > +#include > > > > > > #include > > > #include > > > @@ -70,6 +71,61 @@ void scu_enable(void __iomem *scu_base) > > > */ > > > flush_cache_all(); > > > } > > > + > > > +static const struct of_device_id scu_match[] = { > > > + { .compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-scu", }, > > > + { .compatible = "arm,cortex-a5-scu", }, > > > + { } > > > +}; > > > + > > > +/* > > > + * Helper API to get SCU base address > > > + * In case platform DT do not have SCU node, or iomap fails > > > + * this call will fallback and will try to map via call to > > > + * scu_a9_get_base. > > > + * This will return ownership of scu_base to the caller > > > + */ > > > +void __iomem *of_scu_get_base(void) > > > +{ > > > + unsigned long base = 0; > > > + struct device_node *np; > > > + void __iomem *scu_base; > > > + > > > + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, scu_match); > > > > could we check np before calling of_iomap()? > > > > > + scu_base = of_iomap(np, 0); > > > + of_node_put(np); > > > + if (!scu_base) { > > > + pr_err("%s failed to map scu_base via DT\n", __func__); > > > > For non-ca5, non-ca9 based SoCs, we'll see this error msg. We understand > > what does it mean, but it may confuse normal users. In current version, > > berlin doesn't complain like this for non-ca9 SoCs > > oops, I just realized that the non-ca9 berlin arm SoC version isn't upstreamed. > Below is the draft version I planed. Basically speaking, the code tries to > find "arm,cortex-a9-scu" node from DT, if can't, we think we don't need to > worry about SCU. Is there any elegant solution for my situation? I just realized that (another realized :D) we uses PSCI enable method for non-ca9 base SoCs, so "marvell,berlin-smp" enable method is only for the SoCs which have CA9 compatible SCU. Sorry for the noise, your patch looks good to me.