From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:46:50 +0000 Subject: Boot failures in -next due to 'ARM: dts: imx: Remove skeleton.dtsi' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20161116184649.GF11228@leverpostej> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 09:45:35AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Hi, Hi, > my 'sabrelite' and 'imx25-pdk' qemu boot tests are failing in linux-next. > > Bisect for the sabrelite failure points to commit 'ARM: dts: imx: Remove skeleton.dtsi'. > > Bisect log is attached. Complete test logs are at > http://kerneltests.org/builders/qemu-arm-next/builds/571/steps/qemubuildcommand/logs/stdio > > Boot log for imx25-pdk: > > qemu-system-arm: findnode_nofail Couldn't find node /chosen: FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND So this implies we no longer have a /chosen node. We should add one to the relevant dts{i,} files, with stdout-path and so on. > Boot log for sabrelite: > > [ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0 > [ 0.000000] Linux version 4.9.0-rc5-next-20161116 (groeck at jupiter.roeck-us.net) (gcc version 4.9.2 (GCC) ) #1 SMP Tue Nov 15 22:34:35 PST 2016 > [ 0.000000] CPU: ARMv7 Processor [410fc090] revision 0 (ARMv7), cr=10c5387d > [ 0.000000] CPU: PIPT / VIPT nonaliasing data cache, VIPT nonaliasing instruction cache > [ 0.000000] OF: fdt:Machine model: Freescale i.MX6 DualLite SABRE Lite Board > [ 0.000000] earlycon: ec_imx21 at MMIO 0x021e8000 (options '') > [ 0.000000] bootconsole [ec_imx21] enabled > [ 0.000000] INITRD: 0x14000000+0x00501600 is not a memory region - disabling initrd > [ 0.000000] cma: Failed to reserve 64 MiB > [ 0.000000] Memory policy: Data cache writeback > > [ stuck here until aborted ] The last message was from build_mem_types_table(), called from paging_init(). We'll head on to unflatten_device_tree() shortly afterwards. I wonder if the DTB is corrupted somehow in this case. Maybe the initrd and cma failures is due to unparseable memory nodes. Could you try with memblock=debug to see if memory looks as expected? Thanks, Mark.