From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Boot failures in -next due to 'ARM: dts: imx: Remove skeleton.dtsi'
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:05:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161117150551.GA21742@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <198d764e-1612-81b4-5f4e-0c221a23c8e0@roeck-us.net>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 06:44:55AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/17/2016 02:55 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:40:24PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 08:27:09PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> >>>Hi Guenter,
> >>>
> >>>On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>Anyway, I guess the problem is that the "official" dtb files no longer provide
> >>>>the skeleton /chosen and /memory nodes (and maybe others), and qemu seems to
> >>>>expect that they are provided. Is that correct ?
> >>>
> >>>imx6qdl-sabrelite.dtsi provides chosen and memory nodes.
> >>
> >>Yes, but not the 'device_type' property, which the kernel seems to expect.
> >
> >Memory nodes require this property per ePAPR and the devicetree.org
> >spec, so the bug is that we didn't add those when removing the
> >skeleton.dtsi include.
>
> The downside from qemu perspective is that the real hardware seems
> to add the property unconditionally, or the boot failure would have
> been seen there as well.
>
> I submitted https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/695951/; we'll see how it goes.
Sure, the firmare/bootlaoder you're using may add this automatically.
My worry is that adding this to a generic file in QEMU only serves to
mask this class of bug for other boards (i.e. they'll work fine in QEMU,
but not on real HW using whatever bootlaoder happens ot be there).
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-17 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-16 17:45 Boot failures in -next due to 'ARM: dts: imx: Remove skeleton.dtsi' Guenter Roeck
2016-11-16 18:43 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-11-16 18:46 ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-16 22:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-11-16 22:27 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-11-16 22:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-11-16 22:59 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-11-17 10:55 ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-17 14:44 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-11-17 15:05 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-11-17 16:17 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-11-17 16:39 ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-17 17:23 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161117150551.GA21742@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).