From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: rostedt@goodmis.org (Steven Rostedt)
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 11:45:23 -0500
Subject: [PATCH V8 1/3] tracing: add a possibility of exporting function
 trace to other places instead of ring buffer only
In-Reply-To: <87vavkesy6.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <1479438454-28650-1-git-send-email-zhang.chunyan@linaro.org>
 <1479438454-28650-2-git-send-email-zhang.chunyan@linaro.org>
 <20161118092905.769044bf@gandalf.local.home>
 <87vavkesy6.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
Message-ID: <20161118114523.70b9583f@gandalf.local.home>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 16:57:53 +0200
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> writes:
> 
> > This looks good to me, although I would like this to go through my tree
> > (to make sure it gets all my testing). I understand the next two
> > patches depend on this, how would you want to go about that?
> >
> > One is that I can pull it in the next merge window, and the rest go in
> > after that. Or I can take the other two patches with the proper acks as
> > well.  
> 
> I just asked for the last patch be split 4 ways, but otherwise, they
> have my acks. If Chunyan can do that, you can take all of them into your
> tree.
> 

OK, I'll wait for the split then.

Thanks,

-- Steve