From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:41:50 -0800 Subject: [GIT PULL] Second Round of Renesas ARM64 Based SoC DT Updates for v4.10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20161119014150.GC2543@localhost> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 03:04:55PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd, > > Please consider these second round of Renesas ARM64 based SoC DT updates > for v4.10. > > This pull request is based on a merge of: > > * The previous round of such requests, tagged as renesas-arm64-dt-for-v4.10, > which I have already sent a pull-request for. > * The "Second Round of Renesas ARM Based SoC Drivers Updates for v4.10", > tagged as renesas-drivers2-for-v4.10, which I have also sent a pull > request for. This is included to provide dependencies for adding device > nodes for PRR. Please avoid entangling these pull requests, since now I can't merge DT since I'm rejecting your drivers pull request. I also don't understand why you need a driver branch as base. The PRR nodes are literally just a compatible field and a reg entry. It should depend on nothing. So, I'm a little confused here. Please disentangle this and send a separate pull request, I'll be happy to merge that. -Olof