From: maitysanchayan@gmail.com (maitysanchayan at gmail.com)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix continuous selection format
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:41:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161122061153.GA2484@Sanchayan-Arch.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59ac10adfe92916770aa30146e958887@agner.ch>
On 16-11-21 15:15:41, Stefan Agner wrote:
> On 2016-11-20 21:54, Sanchayan Maity wrote:
> > Current DMA implementation was not handling the continuous selection
> > format viz. SPI chip select would be deasserted even between sequential
> > serial transfers. Use the cs_change variable and correctly set or
> > reset the CONT bit accordingly for case where peripherals require
> > the chip select to be asserted between sequential transfers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c
> > index b1ee1f5..41422cd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c
> > @@ -261,6 +261,8 @@ static int dspi_next_xfer_dma_submit(struct fsl_dspi *dspi)
> > dspi->dma->tx_dma_buf[i] = SPI_PUSHR_TXDATA(val) |
> > SPI_PUSHR_PCS(dspi->cs) |
> > SPI_PUSHR_CTAS(0);
> > + if (!dspi->cs_change)
> > + dspi->dma->tx_dma_buf[i] |= SPI_PUSHR_CONT;
> > dspi->tx += tx_word + 1;
> >
> > dma->tx_desc = dmaengine_prep_slave_single(dma->chan_tx,
>
> Other transfer mode use:
>
> if ((dspi->cs_change) && (!dspi->len))
>
> dspi_pushr &= ~SPI_PUSHR_CONT;
>
> which indicates that they only clear SPI_PUSHR_CONT at the very end of a
> transfer... The DMA code currently deselects after every DMA transfer if
> dspi->cs_change is set.
>
> Maybe we should use the helper dspi_data_to_pushr to fill the DMA buffer
> and _clear_ SPI_PUSHR_CONT if necessary like the other transfer modes
> do... Then we can use the for loop to fill the complete buffer and get
> rid of some code dupplication.
>
> I see that dspi_data_to_pushr does move len too, which we did not in the
> DMA case. dspi->len gets incremented only on successful DMA transfer in
> dspi_dma_xfer. However, I wonder if that is not even a bug: We increment
> dspi->tx always, but len only on success. This makes len go off sync
> with regards to the tx pointer which does not help anybody. So lets get
> rid of the update code in dspi_dma_xfer
>
Thanks for the feedback. Using dspi_data_to_pushr really cleans up that
tx path very nicely. Why didn't I see it. Will send a follow up patch
soon after testing again.
- Sanchayan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-22 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-21 5:54 [PATCH v2 0/4] Fixes for Vybrid SPI DMA implementation Sanchayan Maity
2016-11-21 5:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix SPI transfer issue when using multiple SPI_IOC_MESSAGE Sanchayan Maity
2016-11-21 19:18 ` Mark Brown
2016-11-21 19:14 ` maitysanchayan at gmail.com
2016-11-21 19:18 ` maitysanchayan at gmail.com
2016-11-22 16:22 ` Mark Brown
2016-11-21 5:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix continuous selection format Sanchayan Maity
2016-11-21 23:15 ` Stefan Agner
2016-11-22 6:11 ` maitysanchayan at gmail.com [this message]
2016-11-21 5:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix incorrect DMA setup Sanchayan Maity
2016-11-21 23:16 ` Stefan Agner
2016-11-22 17:26 ` Applied "spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix incorrect DMA setup" to the spi tree Mark Brown
2016-11-21 5:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Minor code cleanup and error path fixes Sanchayan Maity
2016-11-21 23:22 ` Stefan Agner
2016-11-22 6:12 ` maitysanchayan at gmail.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161122061153.GA2484@Sanchayan-Arch.localdomain \
--to=maitysanchayan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox