From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shijie.huang@arm.com (Huang Shijie) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:03:42 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/6] mm: hugetlb: rename some allocation functions In-Reply-To: References: <1479107259-2011-1-git-send-email-shijie.huang@arm.com> <1479107259-2011-2-git-send-email-shijie.huang@arm.com> <52b661c9-f4b0-3d94-cf9b-a0ffd5ecb723@suse.cz> <20161129085349.GA16569@sha-win-210.asiapac.arm.com> Message-ID: <20161130030341.GB18502@sha-win-210.asiapac.arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:44:23AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 11/29/2016 09:53 AM, Huang Shijie wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 02:29:03PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > > On 11/14/2016 08:07 AM, Huang Shijie wrote: > > > > static inline bool gigantic_page_supported(void) { return true; } > > > > #else > > > > +static inline struct page *alloc_gigantic_page(int nid, unsigned int order) > > > > +{ > > > > + return NULL; > > > > +} > > > > > > This hunk is not explained by the description. Could belong to a later > > > patch? > > > > > > > Okay, I can create an extra patch to add the description for the > > alloc_gigantic_page(). > > Not sure about extra patch, just move it to an existing later patch that > relies on it? The whole patch set has been merged to Andrew's tree, so an extra patch is better. :) Thanks Huang Shijie