From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shawnguo@kernel.org (Shawn Guo) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 09:12:46 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: dts: zx: Fix gic GICR property In-Reply-To: References: <1476361881-19685-1-git-send-email-jun.nie@linaro.org> <1476361881-19685-2-git-send-email-jun.nie@linaro.org> <3937871.l5gZt4hBke@wuerfel> <20161205022451.GA2749@dragon> Message-ID: <20161206011244.GC2749@dragon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Olof, On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:55:02PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi Shawn, > > On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Shawn Guo wrote: > > Hi Arnd, > > > > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:28:58PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> Given that there is any concern about the patch now, and the merge > >> window is almost open, I'm moving both patches to the > >> next/fixes-non-critical branch and will merge it for v4.10 instead > >> of sending it for v4.9. > >> > >> If you end up deciding that the patch is wrong, please follow up > >> with a fix on top. Once the situation is resolved and the patch > >> merged upstream, feel free to ask stable at vger.kernel.org for a > >> backport to stable kernels to get it into v4.9.x. > > > > The patch is correct, though it can be cleaned up a bit further per > > Marc's suggestion. Since we now have 4.9-rc8, I'm wondering if we can > > still get this into 4.9 to save the stable kernel backport. > > > > I sent you a cleanup patch on top of this one yesterday. If you like, > > I can quickly resend the patch with the cleanup squashed. > > Since the patches have already been applied, an incremental patch to > apply on top would work best here. No problem. So would you please apply the incremental patch [1] to the same branch? Or I can send it to you later during -rc cycles. Just let me know your preference. Shawn [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg546957.html