From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] usb: gadget: udc: atmel: Fix check in usba_ep_enable()
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 23:06:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161206230604.4bcdb3e7@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1481061583-4727-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Hi Felipe,
I realize I sent this patch to your old @ti.com email address. Do you
want me to resend it?
Regards,
Boris
On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 22:59:43 +0100
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> desc->bEndpointAddress & USB_ENDPOINT_NUMBER_MASK is not necessarily
> equal to ep->index and that's perfectly fine. The usba endpoint index is
> just an internal identifier used by the driver to know which registers
> to use for a USB endpoint.
>
> Enforcing this constraint is not only useless, but can also lead to
> errors since nothing guarantees that the endpoint number and index are
> matching when an endpoint is selected for a specific descriptor, thus
> leading to errors at ->enable() time when it's already too late to choose
> another endpoint.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> Hi,
>
> I intentionally didn't add the Cc stable and Fixes tags because this
> bug dates back to the drivers creation, and I fear the index <->
> epnum constraint was actually required at that time.
>
> Note that I discovered this bug thanks to the WARN_ON_ONCE() in
> usb_ep_queue() [1] which was introduced in 4.5.
> It might appear that this problem was silently ignored before that
> (with part of the usba_ep_enable() code being skipped without any
> notice).
>
> Regards,
>
> Boris
>
> [1]http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c#L264
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c
> index bb1f6c8f0f01..981d2639d413 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c
> @@ -531,11 +531,8 @@ usba_ep_enable(struct usb_ep *_ep, const struct usb_endpoint_descriptor *desc)
>
> maxpacket = usb_endpoint_maxp(desc) & 0x7ff;
>
> - if (((desc->bEndpointAddress & USB_ENDPOINT_NUMBER_MASK) != ep->index)
> - || ep->index == 0
> - || desc->bDescriptorType != USB_DT_ENDPOINT
> - || maxpacket == 0
> - || maxpacket > ep->fifo_size) {
> + if (ep->index == 0 || desc->bDescriptorType != USB_DT_ENDPOINT ||
> + maxpacket == 0 || maxpacket > ep->fifo_size) {
> DBG(DBG_ERR, "ep_enable: Invalid argument");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-06 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-06 21:59 [PATCH] usb: gadget: udc: atmel: Fix check in usba_ep_enable() Boris Brezillon
2016-12-06 22:06 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2016-12-07 10:35 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161206230604.4bcdb3e7@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).