From: ynorov@caviumnetworks.com (Yury Norov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [Question] New mmap64 syscall?
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 21:18:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161207154811.GA15248@yury-N73SV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f544bcc3-8aae-1bd0-b744-9964fc038a51@redhat.com>
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 02:23:55PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 12/06/2016 07:54 PM, Yury Norov wrote:
> >3. Introduce new mmap64() syscall like this:
> >sys_mmap64(void *addr, size_t len, int prot, int flags, int fd, struct off_pair *off);
> >(The pointer here because otherwise we have 7 args, if simply pass off_hi and
> >off_lo in registers.)
>
> I would prefer a batched mmap/munmap/mremap/mprotect/madvise interface, so
> that VM changes can be coalesced and the output reduced. This interface
> could then be used to implement mmap on 32-bit architectures as well because
> the offset restrictions would not apply there.
Hi Florian,
I frankly don't understand what you mean, All syscalls you mentioned
doesn't take off_t or other 64-bit arguments. 'VM changes' - virtual
memory? If so, I don't see any changes in VM with this approach, just
correct handling of big offsets.
> This interface
> could then be used to implement mmap on 32-bit architectures as well
This is for 32-bit architectures only. 64 bit arches use
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/wordsize-64/mmap.c for both mmap and mmap64,
and they don't need that tricks with off_t. Or you meaning to switch
64-bit mmap to this interface?
Please explain what you mean in details.
Yury
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-07 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-06 18:54 [Question] New mmap64 syscall? Yury Norov
2016-12-06 21:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-07 10:34 ` Yury Norov
2016-12-07 11:07 ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2016-12-07 12:39 ` Yury Norov
2016-12-07 16:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-12-07 16:43 ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2016-12-07 21:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-10 9:10 ` Pavel Machek
2016-12-10 9:21 ` Pavel Machek
2016-12-11 12:56 ` Yury Norov
2016-12-11 12:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: move argument checkers of mmap_pgoff() to separated routine Yury Norov
2016-12-11 12:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] sys_mmap64() Yury Norov
2016-12-11 14:48 ` kbuild test robot
2016-12-11 14:56 ` kbuild test robot
2016-12-11 12:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: make pagoff_t type 64-bit Yury Norov
2016-12-11 13:31 ` kbuild test robot
2016-12-11 13:41 ` kbuild test robot
2016-12-11 14:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:55 ` Yury Norov
2016-12-16 11:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-18 9:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-07 13:23 ` [Question] New mmap64 syscall? Florian Weimer
2016-12-07 15:48 ` Yury Norov [this message]
2016-12-08 15:47 ` Florian Weimer
2017-01-03 20:54 ` Pavel Machek
2017-01-12 16:13 ` Florian Weimer
2017-01-12 21:51 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161207154811.GA15248@yury-N73SV \
--to=ynorov@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox