From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:09:01 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ASoC: simple-card-utils: enable
 clocks/clock-names/clock-ranges
In-Reply-To: <87zikbuezr.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
References: <874m2jvtmw.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
 <87zikbuezr.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Message-ID: <20161208220901.GN5423@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 12/05, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
> 
> Current simple-card is supporting this style for clocks
> 
> 	sound {
> 		...
> 		simple-audio-card,cpu {
> 			sound-dai = <&xxx>;
> 			clocks = <&cpu_clock>;
> 		};
> 		simple-audio-card,codec {
> 			sound-dai = <&xxx>;
> 			clocks = <&codec_clock>;
> 		};
> 	};
> 
> Now, it can support this style too, because we can use
> devm_get_clk_from_child() now.
> 
> 	sound {
> 		...
> 		clocks = <&cpu_clock>, <&codec_clock>;
> 		clock-names = "cpu", "codec";
> 		clock-ranges;
> 		...
> 		simple-audio-card,cpu {
> 			sound-dai = <&xxx>;
> 		};
> 		simple-audio-card,codec {
> 			sound-dai = <&xxx>;
> 		};
> 	};
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>

I don't see any reason why we need this patch though. The binding
works as is, so supporting different styles doesn't seem like a
good idea to me. Let's just keep what we have? Even if a sub-node
like cpu or codec gets more than one element in the clocks list
property, we can make that work by passing a clock-name then
based on some sort of other knowledge.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project