[PATCH v2] arm64: mm: Fix memmap to be initialized for the entire section

Yisheng Xie
2016-12-09T13:15:12Z

On 2016/12/9 20:23, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 12/09/2016 08:19 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 9 December 2016 at 12:14, Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Robert,
>>> We have merged your patch to 4.9.0-rc8, however we still meet the similar problem
>>> on our D05 board:
>>>
>>
>> To be clear: does this issue also occur on D05 *without* the patch?
>
> It boots ok on D05 without this patch.
>
> But I think the problem Robert described in the commit message is
> still there, just not triggered in the boot. we met this problem
> when having LTP stress memory test and hit the same BUG_ON.
>
That's right. for D05's case, when trigger the BUG_ON on:
1863 VM_BUG_ON(page_zone(start_page) != page_zone(end_page));

the end_page is not nomap, but BIOS reserved. here is the log I got:

[ 0.000000] efi: 0x00003fc00000-0x00003fffffff [Reserved | | | | | | | | | | | | ]
[...]
[ 5.081443] move_freepages: phys(start_page: 0x20000000,end_page:0x3fff0000)

For invalid pages, their zone and node information is not initialized, and it
do have risk to trigger the BUG_ON, so I have a silly question,
why not just change the BUG_ON:
-----------
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 6de9440..af199b8 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1860,12 +1860,13 @@ int move_freepages(struct zone *zone,
* Remove at a later date when no bug reports exist related to
* grouping pages by mobility
*/
- VM_BUG_ON(page_zone(start_page) != page_zone(end_page));
+ VM_BUG_ON(early_pfn_valid(start_page) && early_pfn_valid(end_page) &&
+ page_zone(start_page) != page_zone(end_page));
#endif

for (page = start_page; page <= end_page;) {
/* Make sure we are not inadvertently changing nodes */
- VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_to_nid(page) != zone_to_nid(zone), page);
+ VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(early_pfn_valid(page) && (page_to_nid(page) != zone_to_nid(zone)), page);

if (!pfn_valid_within(page_to_pfn(page))) {
page++;

Thanks,
Yisheng Xie

> Thanks
> Hanjun
>
> .
>