From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: robh@kernel.org (Rob Herring) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 16:49:27 -0600 Subject: [PATCH v3 2/6] mfd: dt: ranges, #address-cells and #size-cells as optional properties In-Reply-To: <20161206025321.1792-3-andrew@aj.id.au> References: <20161206025321.1792-1-andrew@aj.id.au> <20161206025321.1792-3-andrew@aj.id.au> Message-ID: <20161209224927.3indhfdjgyndtjid@rob-hp-laptop> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 01:53:17PM +1100, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > Whilst describing a device and not a bus, simple-mfd is modelled on > simple-bus where child nodes are iterated and registered as platform > devices. Some complex devices, e.g. the Aspeed LPC controller, can > benefit from address space mapping such that child nodes can use the > regs property to describe their resources within the multi-function > device. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mfd.txt | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) No objections to this, but this is all implied by having a reg property. Acked-by: Rob Herring Rob