From: krzk@kernel.org (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 1/8] soc: samsung: add exynos chipid driver support
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 19:37:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161216173703.GA3746@kozik-lap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1481375323-29724-2-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 06:38:36PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> Exynos SoCs have Chipid, for identification of product IDs and SoC revisions.
> This patch intends to provide initialization code for all these functionalities,
> at the same time it provides some sysfs entries for accessing these information
> to user-space.
>
> This driver uses existing binding for exynos-chipid.
>
> CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
> CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
> [m.szyprowski: for suggestion and code snippet of product_id_to_soc_id]
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig | 5 ++
> drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 122 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
> index 2455339..f9ab858 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
> @@ -14,4 +14,9 @@ config EXYNOS_PM_DOMAINS
> bool "Exynos PM domains" if COMPILE_TEST
> depends on PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS || COMPILE_TEST
>
> +config EXYNOS_CHIPID
> + bool "Exynos Chipid controller driver" if COMPILE_TEST
> + depends on (ARM && ARCH_EXYNOS) || ((ARM || ARM64) && COMPILE_TEST)
1. Why this can be compile tested only on ARM architectures?
2. Don't you need also SOC_BUS?
> + select SOC_BUS
> +
> endif
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile b/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile
> index 3619f2e..2a8a85e 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_PMU) += exynos-pmu.o exynos3250-pmu.o exynos4-pmu.o \
> exynos5250-pmu.o exynos5420-pmu.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_PM_DOMAINS) += pm_domains.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_CHIPID) += exynos-chipid.o
Please put it before EXYNOS_PMU, keeping this sorted alphabetical helps
avoiding conflicts of continuous edits.
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..cf0128b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2016 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> + * http://www.samsung.com/
> + *
> + * EXYNOS - CHIP ID support
> + * Author: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/sys_soc.h>
> +
> +#define EXYNOS_SUBREV_MASK (0xF << 4)
> +#define EXYNOS_MAINREV_MASK (0xF << 0)
> +#define EXYNOS_REV_MASK (EXYNOS_SUBREV_MASK | EXYNOS_MAINREV_MASK)
> +
> +static const struct exynos_soc_id {
> + const char *name;
> + unsigned int id;
> + unsigned int mask;
> +} soc_ids[] = {
> + { "EXYNOS3250", 0xE3472000, 0xFFFFF000 },
> + { "EXYNOS4210", 0x43200000, 0xFFFE0000 },
> + { "EXYNOS4212", 0x43220000, 0xFFFE0000 },
> + { "EXYNOS4412", 0xE4412000, 0xFFFE0000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5250", 0x43520000, 0xFFFFF000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5260", 0xE5260000, 0xFFFFF000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5410", 0xE5410000, 0xFFFFF000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5420", 0xE5420000, 0xFFFFF000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5440", 0xE5440000, 0xFFFFF000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5800", 0xE5422000, 0xFFFFF000 },
> + { "EXYNOS7420", 0xE7420000, 0xFFFFF000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5433", 0xE5433000, 0xFFFFF000 },
> +};
> +
> +static const char * __init product_id_to_soc_id(unsigned int product_id)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(soc_ids); i++)
> + if ((product_id & soc_ids[i].mask) == soc_ids[i].id)
> + return soc_ids[i].name;
> + return "UNKNOWN";
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id of_exynos_chipid_ids[] = {
> + {
> + .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-chipid",
> + },
> + {},
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * exynos_chipid_early_init: Early chipid initialization
> + */
This comment is meaningless, it duplicates the name of function.
> +int __init exynos_chipid_early_init(void)
> +{
> + struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
> + struct soc_device *soc_dev;
> + struct device_node *root;
> + struct device_node *np;
> + void __iomem *exynos_chipid_base;
> + const struct of_device_id *match;
> + u32 product_id;
> + u32 revision;
> +
> + np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL,
> + of_exynos_chipid_ids, &match);
You don't use the match here, so how about either
of_find_matching_node() or of_find_compatible_node()? The latter looks
better (less calls inside) and actually you want just check one
compatible field?
> + if (!np)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + exynos_chipid_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> +
> + if (!exynos_chipid_base)
> + return PTR_ERR(exynos_chipid_base);
> +
> + product_id = readl_relaxed(exynos_chipid_base);
Duplicated space before '='.
> + revision = product_id & EXYNOS_REV_MASK;
> + iounmap(exynos_chipid_base);
> +
> + soc_dev_attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*soc_dev_attr), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!soc_dev_attr)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + soc_dev_attr->family = "Samsung Exynos";
> +
> + root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
> + of_property_read_string(root, "model", &soc_dev_attr->machine);
> + of_node_put(root);
> +
> + soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%x", revision);
> + soc_dev_attr->soc_id = product_id_to_soc_id(product_id);
> +
> +
> + pr_info("Exynos: CPU[%s] CPU_REV[0x%x] Detected\n",
> + product_id_to_soc_id(product_id), revision);
> +
> + soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
> + if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
> + kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision);
> + kfree_const(soc_dev_attr->soc_id);
It wasn't allocated with *_const, so no need to free it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
> + kfree(soc_dev_attr);
> + return PTR_ERR(soc_dev);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +early_initcall(exynos_chipid_early_init);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-16 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20161210130616epcas1p2ce44d503ae03854e7b36b4d37d54900a@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2016-12-10 13:08 ` [PATCH v8 0/8] Introducing Exynos ChipId driver Pankaj Dubey
2016-12-10 13:08 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] soc: samsung: add exynos chipid driver support Pankaj Dubey
2016-12-16 17:37 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2016-12-17 4:06 ` Pankaj Dubey
2016-12-17 12:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-12-19 11:59 ` Markus Reichl
2016-12-19 13:29 ` pankaj.dubey
2016-12-19 18:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-12-21 7:52 ` pankaj.dubey
2016-12-21 14:08 ` Andrzej Hajda
[not found] ` <CGME20161227140255epcas1p1a2c2b50ede0e9b2378c8ac052b1617f6@epcas1p1.samsung.com>
2016-12-27 14:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-12-28 2:38 ` Pankaj Dubey
2016-12-10 13:08 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] ARM: EXYNOS: enable exynos_chipid for ARCH_EXYNOS Pankaj Dubey
2016-12-16 18:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-12-17 4:15 ` Pankaj Dubey
2016-12-10 13:08 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] ARM64: " Pankaj Dubey
2016-12-16 17:38 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-12-10 13:08 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] ARM: EXYNOS: refactor firmware specific routines Pankaj Dubey
2016-12-16 18:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-12-17 3:50 ` Pankaj Dubey
2016-12-10 13:08 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] ARM: EXYNOS: refactor power management " Pankaj Dubey
2016-12-17 14:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-12-10 13:08 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] ARM: EXYNOS: remove secondary startup initialization from smp_prepare_cpus Pankaj Dubey
2016-12-17 18:48 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-12-17 22:06 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-12-10 13:08 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] ARM: EXYNOS: refactor smp specific code and routines Pankaj Dubey
2016-12-17 18:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-12-10 13:08 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] ARM: EXYNOS: refactor of mach-exynos to use chipid information Pankaj Dubey
2016-12-17 19:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-12-16 13:11 ` [PATCH v8 0/8] Introducing Exynos ChipId driver Marek Szyprowski
2016-12-19 13:25 ` pankaj.dubey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161216173703.GA3746@kozik-lap \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).