From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: krzk@kernel.org (Krzysztof Kozlowski) Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 19:35:16 +0200 Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: exynos: Late mach/soc for v4.10 In-Reply-To: References: <1482003132-8844-1-git-send-email-krzk@kernel.org> <20161230155312.oupgyip7wtqwcuy2@kozik-lap> <5b0e55c8-01db-3f02-3526-2f71f4a73d88@samsung.com> <20170102155654.oey6c542vjcqyit2@kozik-lap> Message-ID: <20170102173516.kr43qt2udaaa7m3f@kozik-lap> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 06:25:44PM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > On 01/02/2017 04:56 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 10:20:21AM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > >> On 12/30/2016 04:53 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>> Any comments on this? I guess it won't come as late-late-4.10, so can > >>> you pull it for v4.11? > >> > >>>> Sylwester Nawrocki (1): > >>>> ARM: S3C24XX: Add DMA slave maps for remaining s3c24xx SoCs > >> We need this patch in v4.10 to avoid possible I2S and MMC regressions > >> on selected s3c24xx SoC, since the DMA clients are already modified. > >> If the patch goes in only for v4.11 it would be good to mark it for > >> inclusion in v4.10 stable kernels. > > > > You didn't mention any strict dependencies when sending this patch... > > What do you mean by "needing patch in v4.10"? Is the code already > > not bisectable? Already broken? > > Yes, unfortunately on s3c2410, s3c2412 and s3c2443. I didn't notice > when sending patches for the s3c24xx-iis and s3c2440-sdi drivers > the dma_slave maps were only added for s3c2440 (commit 34681d84a0f7cc2 > dmaengine: s3c24xx: Add dma_slave_map for s3c2440 devices) and not for > remaining SoCs covered by these DMA client drivers. Okay, so either entire pull goes into v4.10 or I will need a resend of this one patch with a little bit extended message why this is a v4.10 fix. BR, Krzysztof