From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: krzk@kernel.org (Krzysztof Kozlowski) Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 20:37:59 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: exynos: make tm2 and tm2e independent from each other In-Reply-To: <20170105092315.swensammin4wbgx5@gangnam.samsung> References: <1483604833-29746-1-git-send-email-jcsing.lee@samsung.com> <1483604833-29746-4-git-send-email-jcsing.lee@samsung.com> <586E0E56.6050608@samsung.com> <20170105092315.swensammin4wbgx5@gangnam.samsung> Message-ID: <20170105183759.ohmsu5ndxt7hwkjj@kozik-lap> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 06:23:15PM +0900, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi Chanwoo, > > > I add the some comment as following: > > - ldo23/25/31/38 have the different value between tm2 and tm2e. > > Thanks for pointing this out. I planned to do this already in a > following patch as for now I think it's out from the scope of this > particular patch. > > > - The patch[1] was alread posted. I think you better to rebase this patch on patch[1]. > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9491769/ > > - ("ARM64: dts: TM2: comply to the samsung pinctrl naming convention") > > Yes, I also thought about this, but I didn't know whether it was > already picked by anyone. I didn't want to stop Jaechul that's > why I was planning to rebase the other rather than this. > But you are right, because some bits of the other patches I know > that have been merged. Thank you! > > Krzysztof, do you mind if I send patch 3 as a reply to this > e-mail? The changes should not affect patch 4, anyway. By patch 3 you mean this patch? Yes, you can send another version as a reply-to but please version it (2.1? etc). Anyway I need a proper rename detection. I pointed proper command last time. Is it working? Best regards, Krzysztof