From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Unhandled level 2 translation fault (11) at 0x000000b8, esr 0x92000046, rpi3 (aarch64)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 14:49:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170111144902.GA20288@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170110121423.GF19960@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:14:23PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 07:06:19PM +0100, Bas van Tiel wrote:
> > > I defined STACKSIZE to the kernel's SIGSTKSZ (16384) and it seems to run
> > > fine, though I'll leave it longer/overnight (on a Juno board). With the
> > > 4K signal stack it was crashing shortly after start.
> >
> > I tried the STACKSIZE of 16384 for both the RPI3 and the PINEA64 board
> > and still see the same behaviour of crashing. Sometimes the process
> > is also blocked for a long time before it crashes.
> >
> > Setting the interval to 200 usec [5 Khz] will help to crash it faster.
> >
> > To further isolate the issue I will create a kernel module (based on a
> > hrtimer) that will sent a periodic signal to the registered process
> > and execute the same sighandler logic to check if the problem is still
> > there.
>
> I lowered the interval to 100us (it was 100ms in the original file) and
> I can indeed trigger segfault easily on Juno. But it doesn't fail in the
> same way every time, I sometimes get permission fault, other times bad
> frame.
With 100us interval, it segfaults on x86 fairly quickly as well, so I
don't think it's a kernel issue.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-11 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-29 16:38 Unhandled level 2 translation fault (11) at 0x000000b8, esr 0x92000046, rpi3 (aarch64) Bas van Tiel
2016-12-29 17:02 ` Neil Armstrong
2016-12-30 7:13 ` Jisheng Zhang
2016-12-30 12:21 ` Bas van Tiel
2017-01-09 15:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-01-09 18:06 ` Bas van Tiel
2017-01-10 12:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-01-11 14:49 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2017-01-11 15:33 ` Dave Martin
2017-01-13 18:47 ` Bas van Tiel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170111144902.GA20288@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).