From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:45:48 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v3 2/5] arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1003 In-Reply-To: <20170111184052.GE29247@leverpostej> References: <20170111144118.17062-1-cov@codeaurora.org> <20170111144118.17062-2-cov@codeaurora.org> <20170111180627.GG20288@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <278a45c0-bd49-b8a2-63ae-80ad851bab9b@arm.com> <20170111184052.GE29247@leverpostej> Message-ID: <20170112154548.twj2ktbfzbsarzbc@localhost> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 06:40:52PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 06:22:08PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On 11/01/17 18:06, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 09:41:15AM -0500, Christopher Covington wrote: > > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S > > >> index 32682be..9ee46df 100644 > > >> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S > > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S > > >> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ > > >> #include > > >> #include > > >> #include > > >> +#include > > >> #include > > >> #include > > >> #include > > >> @@ -140,6 +141,18 @@ ENDPROC(cpu_do_resume) > > >> ENTRY(cpu_do_switch_mm) > > >> mmid x1, x1 // get mm->context.id > > >> bfi x0, x1, #48, #16 // set the ASID > > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_QCOM_FALKOR_ERRATUM_1003 > > >> +alternative_if ARM64_WORKAROUND_QCOM_FALKOR_E1003 > > >> + mrs x2, ttbr0_el1 > > >> + mov x3, #FALKOR_RESERVED_ASID > > >> + bfi x2, x3, #48, #16 // reserved ASID + old BADDR > > >> + msr ttbr0_el1, x2 > > >> + isb > > >> + bfi x2, x0, #0, #48 // reserved ASID + new BADDR > > >> + msr ttbr0_el1, x2 > > >> + isb > > >> +alternative_else_nop_endif > > >> +#endif > > >> msr ttbr0_el1, x0 // set TTBR0 > > >> isb > > >> post_ttbr0_update_workaround > > > > > > Please move the above hunk to a pre_ttbr0_update_workaround macro for > > > consistency with post_ttbr0_update_workaround. > > > > In which case (and also for consistency), should we add that pre_ttbr0 > > macro to entry.S, just before __uaccess_ttbr0_enable? It may not be > > needed in the SW pan case, but it is probably worth entertaining the > > idea that there may be something to do there... > > Likewise, I beleive we may need to modify cpu_set_reserved_ttbr0(). This may be fine if my assumptions about this erratum are correct. In the cpu_set_reserved_ttbr0() case we set TTBR0_EL1 to a table without any entries, so no new entries could be tagged with the old ASID. -- Catalin