From: djkurtz@chromium.org (Daniel Kurtz)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: mt8173: Fix cpu_thermal cooling-maps contributions
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:30:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170113023006.150845-1-djkurtz@chromium.org> (raw)
According to [0], the contribution field for each cooling-device express
their relative power efficiency. Higher weights express higher power
efficiency. Weighting is relative such that if each cooling device has a
weight of 1 they are considered equal. This is particularly useful in
heterogeneous systems where two cooling devices may perform the same kind
of compute, but with different efficiency.
[0] Documentation/thermal/power_allocator.txt
According to Mediatek IC designer, the power efficiency ratio between the
LITTLE core cluster (cooling-device cpu0) and big core cluster
(cooling-device cpu1) is around 3:1 (3072:1024).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
index 12e702771f5c..9a3b0d20f7a8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
@@ -182,12 +182,12 @@
map at 0 {
trip = <&target>;
cooling-device = <&cpu0 0 0>;
- contribution = <1024>;
+ contribution = <3072>;
};
map at 1 {
trip = <&target>;
cooling-device = <&cpu2 0 0>;
- contribution = <2048>;
+ contribution = <1024>;
};
};
};
--
2.11.0.390.gc69c2f50cf-goog
next reply other threads:[~2017-01-13 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-13 2:30 Daniel Kurtz [this message]
2017-01-13 15:36 ` [PATCH] arm64: dts: mt8173: Fix cpu_thermal cooling-maps contributions Matthias Brugger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170113023006.150845-1-djkurtz@chromium.org \
--to=djkurtz@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox