From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 10:38:13 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: gpu: Add Mali Utgard bindings In-Reply-To: <20170116184906.r62di7xiil5lae33@kozik-lap> References: <20170116132424.7038-1-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <20170116184906.r62di7xiil5lae33@kozik-lap> Message-ID: <20170117093813.mxp2hgoxbgske6ru@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 08:49:06PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 02:24:23PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > The ARM Mali Utgard GPU family is embedded into a number of SoCs from > > Allwinner, Amlogic, Mediatek or Rockchip. > > > > Add a binding for the GPU of that family. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-utgard.txt | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-utgard.txt > > Do you have a driver in kernel which will implement these bindings? No, but we have bindings for out-of-tree drivers already. > Defining them for out-of-tree driver does not bring any benefits > (3rd party driver will not respect them anyway). You could see it the other way around too. The out-of-tree drivers don't respect it at the moment because there's no binding to respect. And at least for us, we definitely plan on doing that. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: not available URL: