From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown) Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 12:21:29 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] spi: pxa2xx: Prepare for edge-triggered interrupts In-Reply-To: <1484856272.2133.253.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <7b15a0910a3ad861fd32161c72559bafa7b71e29.1484592296.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com> <87ziiqdstr.fsf@belgarion.home> <4d97e416-4d32-3b9f-0695-de116a4b26bd@siemens.com> <87r340eq28.fsf@belgarion.home> <20170118124645.6ugjwbfeq5vsh2to@sirena.org.uk> <7e5fb21d-35bd-6ac3-9e6f-cffed656997f@siemens.com> <20170119195701.kueutgmahr6bmxhq@sirena.org.uk> <1484856272.2133.253.camel@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: <20170120122129.6cn5phrobeldpikp@sirena.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:04:32PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 19:57 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > I'm missing patches 1 and 3, what's going on here? > Patch 1 had been applied by you. I think Jan just needs to resend with > proper version and set of patches. OK - Jan, the purpose of numbering patches in a series is so we can tell what order they come in. That's it. If the set of patches gets changed due to things being added or removed the numbers will be different but that's totally OK as their only relevance is in ordering things within a given posting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: not available URL: