[PATCH 2/7] MFD: add STM32 DFSDM support

Jonathan Cameron
2017-02-04T12:15:39Z

On 30/01/17 11:13, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks everyone for you feedback!
> My comments below.
>
> On 01/29/2017 03:34 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 01/29/2017 03:19 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>>> On 01/29/2017 01:28 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>>> Jonathan, Mark, Please could you share your opinion on this topic?
>>>> Hmm - based on a fairly quick read through of the code (which is never
>>>> ideal!). I can see that the ideal would indeed be as Lee says, to
>>>> expand the IIO interfaces sufficiently to support what you need.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So, reading the code (fairly quickly I'm afraid as had a lot of reviews
>>>> to catch up on this weekend).
>>>> What we need:
>>>> 1) DMA support in the ADC driver. This would be a good anyway!
>>>> 2) DMA consumer support - I defer to Lars for comments on this.
>>>> 3) Means of describing and controlling the sinc filters applied.
>>>> 4) Appropriate channel support. I'm not convinced that it doesn't make
>>>> sense to have IIO channels for the microphones - at least in a streaming
>>>> mode. It's data - I don't really care what ;)
>>>> Coarsely it's a filtered pulse per period counter which is
>>>> a perfectly valid type to have a channel for.
>>>>
>>>> The big question to my mind is the DMA consumer support. How would
>>>> it work. It it wouldn't this is somewhat of a non starter.
>>>>
>>>> To bring up another slightly ugly MFD case where it is borderline
>>>> on whether an MFD makes sense (just as a reference point of something
>>>> we have discussed a few times before)
>>>>
>>>> ADCs with features directed at touchscreen support.
>>>> These are odd as the ADC bit is generic, but the specific output
>>>> and read sequences used for touchscreen reading don't correspond to
>>>> anything that makes any real sense for other applications.
>>>>
>>>> We have started to get hybrid drives that have an MFD underneath but
>>>> do the ADC reads through IIO consumer interfaces, and the timing
>>>> control from a touchscreen driver. We haven't really gotten this
>>>> one right yet either.
>>>>
>>>> Here however, to my mind things are different - as I read it
>>>> (and feel free to point out what I'm missing), the sound usecase
>>>> is just a question of setting up sampling frequencies and filters
>>>> appropriate to the microphones and what ASoC expects?
>>>>
>>>> That's not to say the IIO dma stuff is flexible enough (yet) to
>>>> handle the data flows, but perhaps we can work towards that.
>>>
>>> Yeah, so this is a bit different, but not unexpected. And I'm sure we'll see
>>> more similar hardware in the future. I've talked about this before[1], the
>>> cost structure of creating and manufacturing new hardware drives the design
>>> in a certain direction so that we end up with general purpose hardware that
>>> suddenly has applications in multiple frameworks that were previously fully
>>> orthogonal.
>>>
>>> This device is certainly not a multi-function-device. It only has one
>>> function, it's a sigma-delta demodulator. It is rather a
>>> multi-purpose-device. It can be used for sigma-delta demodulation in audio
>>> applications as well as more specialized data capture applications.
>>>
>>> It's comparable to something like a GPIO that can be used to control a reset
>>> pin or turn on and off a LED. The GPIO chip is not considered
>>> multi-function-device though, even though it can be used for many different
>>> applications.
>>>
>>> As for DMA we already have a lot of DMA infrastructure on the audio side and
>>> we probably want to reuse that rather than inserting IIO as a middle layer
>>> since audio buffer capture as different requirements from IIO buffer and
>>> we'd have to go the route of the least common denominator and loose
>>> expressibility in the process.
>>>
>>> I've created a IIO buffer[2] that does not capture data to memory but is
>>> only used to enable/disable the data capture process. We use this in setups
>>> where the data is passed from the converter to a application specific
>>> processing chain without ever going through system memory. This buffer could
>>> probably also be used here on the audio side to control the converter state.
>>
>> I forgot to mention. I think the first thing we should do is work on
>> terminology. This is not an ADC, this is a configurable low-pass-filter.
>>
>> It works in conjunction with a analog frontend (ADC) that produces a 1-bit
>> pulse-density-modulated stream, takes that stream and converts it into N-bit
>> PCM samples. The PCM samples are generated at a fraction of the PDM stream
>> samplerate that corresponds to the decimation factor.
>>
>> This is not an unusual device. Many audio CODEC and audio controllers
>> contain such a core as well as most SigmaDelta converters supported by IIO.
>> What is special about this part is that it is a dedicated core that is not
>> embedded in some other hardware component. This creates greater flexibility,
>> but of course also greater complexity that is required to manage all that
>> flexibility.
>>
>> We shouldn't codify anything about the kernel internal frameworks through
>> which the device might be exposed into the devicetree. We should accurately
>> describe the hardware (including the analog frontend) and then create a
>> appropriate software structures to handle them.
>>
>
> So if everyone is aligned, i will abandon the MFD driver and try to bind
> an ASoC driver on IIO interface. The "challenge" is to
> define appropriate relation ship between ASoC and IIO...
>
> In a first step, a lot of question to answers and points to clarify... i
> will reply to associated mails.
>
> Then I see two main topics to clarify:
> - DFSDM integration in IIO in a generic way. Lars, if i well interpret,
> your proposal should be to introduce front-end and filter notions in
> IIO, to support this kind of hardware?
> - DMA engine for audio purpose.
> I propose to come back with RFC for both subjects.
>
> If you want to have more detail on DFSDM: DFSDM datasheet is included in
> STM32F413 datasheet available here:
> http://www.st.com/content/ccc/resource/technical/document/reference_manual/group0/81/ea/88/1f/97/9e/4a/d0/DM00305666/files/DM00305666.pdf/jcr:content/translations/en.DM00305666.pdf
>
> DFSDM Block diagram p 384
Sounds like a sensible way forward to me.

Might well go through a few more rounds before we get this right, but
I agree with Lars that this looks to be something we are going to meet
more and more in the future so would be excellent to get it right!

Jonathan
>
> Regards
> Arnaud
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>