From: takahiro.akashi@linaro.org (AKASHI Takahiro)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v30 01/11] memblock: add memblock_cap_memory_range()
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:49:07 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170124084907.3838-1-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170124084638.3770-1-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Add memblock_cap_memory_range() which will remove all the memblock regions
except the memory range specified in the arguments. In addition, rework is
done on memblock_mem_limit_remove_map() to re-implement it using
memblock_cap_memory_range().
This function, like memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(), will not remove
memblocks with MEMMAP_NOMAP attribute as they may be mapped and accessed
later as "device memory."
See the commit a571d4eb55d8 ("mm/memblock.c: add new infrastructure to
address the mem limit issue").
This function is used, in a succeeding patch in the series of arm64 kdump
suuport, to limit the range of usable memory, or System RAM, on crash dump
kernel.
(Please note that "mem=" parameter is of little use for this purpose.)
Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com>
Cc: linux-mm at kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/memblock.h | 1 +
mm/memblock.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index 5b759c9acf97..fbfcacc50c29 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ phys_addr_t memblock_mem_size(unsigned long limit_pfn);
phys_addr_t memblock_start_of_DRAM(void);
phys_addr_t memblock_end_of_DRAM(void);
void memblock_enforce_memory_limit(phys_addr_t memory_limit);
+void memblock_cap_memory_range(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
void memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(phys_addr_t limit);
bool memblock_is_memory(phys_addr_t addr);
int memblock_is_map_memory(phys_addr_t addr);
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 7608bc305936..fea1688fef60 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -1514,11 +1514,37 @@ void __init memblock_enforce_memory_limit(phys_addr_t limit)
(phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX);
}
+void __init memblock_cap_memory_range(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
+{
+ int start_rgn, end_rgn;
+ int i, ret;
+
+ if (!size)
+ return;
+
+ ret = memblock_isolate_range(&memblock.memory, base, size,
+ &start_rgn, &end_rgn);
+ if (ret)
+ return;
+
+ /* remove all the MAP regions */
+ for (i = memblock.memory.cnt - 1; i >= end_rgn; i--)
+ if (!memblock_is_nomap(&memblock.memory.regions[i]))
+ memblock_remove_region(&memblock.memory, i);
+
+ for (i = start_rgn - 1; i >= 0; i--)
+ if (!memblock_is_nomap(&memblock.memory.regions[i]))
+ memblock_remove_region(&memblock.memory, i);
+
+ /* truncate the reserved regions */
+ memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, 0, base);
+ memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved,
+ base + size, (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX);
+}
+
void __init memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(phys_addr_t limit)
{
- struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.memory;
phys_addr_t max_addr;
- int i, ret, start_rgn, end_rgn;
if (!limit)
return;
@@ -1529,19 +1555,7 @@ void __init memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(phys_addr_t limit)
if (max_addr == (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX)
return;
- ret = memblock_isolate_range(type, max_addr, (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX,
- &start_rgn, &end_rgn);
- if (ret)
- return;
-
- /* remove all the MAP regions above the limit */
- for (i = end_rgn - 1; i >= start_rgn; i--) {
- if (!memblock_is_nomap(&type->regions[i]))
- memblock_remove_region(type, i);
- }
- /* truncate the reserved regions */
- memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, max_addr,
- (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX);
+ memblock_cap_memory_range(0, max_addr);
}
static int __init_memblock memblock_search(struct memblock_type *type, phys_addr_t addr)
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-24 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-24 8:46 [PATCH v30 00/11] arm64: add kdump support AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-24 8:49 ` AKASHI Takahiro [this message]
2017-01-24 8:49 ` [PATCH v30 02/11] arm64: limit memory regions based on DT property, usable-memory-range AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-24 8:49 ` [PATCH v30 03/11] arm64: kdump: reserve memory for crash dump kernel AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-24 8:49 ` [PATCH v30 04/11] arm64: mm: allow for unmapping memory region from kernel mapping AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-24 11:32 ` Pratyush Anand
2017-01-25 6:37 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-25 15:49 ` James Morse
2017-01-26 8:08 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-24 8:49 ` [PATCH v30 05/11] arm64: kdump: protect crash dump kernel memory AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-25 17:37 ` James Morse
2017-01-26 11:28 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-27 11:19 ` James Morse
2017-01-27 17:15 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-27 18:56 ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-30 8:42 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-30 8:27 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-27 13:59 ` James Morse
2017-01-27 15:42 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-27 19:41 ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-24 8:50 ` [PATCH v30 06/11] arm64: kdump: implement machine_crash_shutdown() AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-24 8:50 ` [PATCH v30 07/11] arm64: kdump: add VMCOREINFO's for user-space tools AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-24 8:50 ` [PATCH v30 08/11] arm64: kdump: provide /proc/vmcore file AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-24 8:50 ` [PATCH v30 09/11] arm64: kdump: enable kdump in defconfig AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-24 8:50 ` [PATCH v30 10/11] Documentation: kdump: describe arm64 port AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-24 8:53 ` [PATCH v30 11/11] Documentation: dt: chosen properties for arm64 kdump AKASHI Takahiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170124084907.3838-1-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--to=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).