[PATCH 01/11] clk: sunxi-ng: mux: Fix determine_rate for mux clocks with pre-dividers

Chen-Yu Tsai
2017-01-26T11:22:11Z

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Hi Chen-Yu,
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:32:20AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> The determine_rate helper used ccu_mux_helper_adjust_parent_for_prediv()
>> to adjust the parent_rate to account for pre-dividers, but then passed
>> the pristine parent clock rate from clk_hw_get_rate() to the round()
>> callback, thereby ignoring the pre-divider adjustment. In addition,
>> it was saving the adjusted parent rate back into struct
>> clk_rate_request.
>>
>> This patch fixes this by saving the pristine parent clock rate, and
>> adding a copy that is adjusted and passed to the round() callback.
>> The pristine copy, if it is the best solution, would be saved back
>> to struct clk_rate_request.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_mux.c | 7 ++++---
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_mux.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_mux.c
>> index 858a48621631..3445041894e7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_mux.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_mux.c
>> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ int ccu_mux_helper_determine_rate(struct ccu_common *common,
>> unsigned int i;
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw); i++) {
>> - unsigned long tmp_rate, parent_rate;
>> + unsigned long tmp_rate, parent_rate, adj_parent_rate;
>> struct clk_hw *parent;
>>
>> parent = clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(hw, i);
>> @@ -79,10 +79,11 @@ int ccu_mux_helper_determine_rate(struct ccu_common *common,
>> continue;
>>
>> parent_rate = clk_hw_get_rate(parent);
>> + adj_parent_rate = parent_rate;
>> ccu_mux_helper_adjust_parent_for_prediv(common, cm, i,
>> - &parent_rate);
>> + &adj_parent_rate);
>>
>> - tmp_rate = round(cm, clk_hw_get_rate(parent), req->rate, data);
>> + tmp_rate = round(cm, parent_rate, req->rate, data);
>
> Shouldn't you use the adjusted rate here too?

You're right. Thanks!

ChenYu