linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: efi: add vmlinux debug link to the Image binary
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:26:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170126182453.GA24043@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu-GQAQU2Ety+rBvZ-9VbUHe+jQQosFJ-63UTQ7pPHHh0Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:00:44PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 25 January 2017 at 11:53, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:39:19AM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> When building with debugging symbols, take the absolute path to the
> >> vmlinux binary and add it to the special PE/COFF debug table entry.
> >>
> >> These entries are used internally by EDK2 based* debug builds of UEFI
> >> to populate the DebugImageInfo table, which can be used by debuggers
> >> as well as by the OS itself to retrieve information about all loaded
> >> PE/COFF executables. This is highly useful for source level debugging
> >> of the UEFI stub.
> >
> > Does that mean EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY and friends are
> > EDK2-specific?
> >
> > Or just that the way EDK2 happens to use those is EDK2-specific?
> 
> Those values are defined by the PE/COFF spec, and I assume that a
> CodeView type entry in the debug table usually contains a NUL
> terminated string as well, given that the EDK2 crowd is very
> Wintel-heavy.

So we don't actually have a definition of the format of a CodeView
entry, and we're guessing?

That does feel a little scary, especially given the fields are named
"Unknown". :(

> The significance of mentioning EDK2 here was that I thought that the
> DebugImageInfo table was a PI construct rather than something
> described in the UEFI spec. But looking more carefully, it seems that
> this table is in fact a UEFI construct, so I should probably drop this
> mention from the commit log

That would probably be for the best, yes.

Thanks,
Mark.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-26 18:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-25 10:39 [PATCH v2 0/2] efi/arm64: add vmlinux link to PE/COFF debug table Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-25 10:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] efi: libstub: Preserve .debug sections after absolute relocation check Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-25 10:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: efi: add vmlinux debug link to the Image binary Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-25 11:45   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-25 11:53   ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-25 12:00     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-26 18:26       ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-01-26 18:33         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-26 18:44           ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170126182453.GA24043@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).