From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: krzk@kernel.org (Krzysztof Kozlowski) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 20:02:03 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 3/8] pinctrl: samsung: Add support for pad retention control for Exynos5433 SoCs In-Reply-To: <20170126194811.rori5j5hmclniqig@kozik-lap> References: <1485419634-28331-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <1485419634-28331-4-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <20170126194811.rori5j5hmclniqig@kozik-lap> Message-ID: <20170127180203.eacwbyb2noqjpmgw@kozik-lap> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:48:11PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:33:49AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > This patch adds support for retention control for Exynos5433 SoCs. Three > > groups of pins has been defined for retention control: common shared group > > for ALIVE, CPIF, eSE, FINGER, IMEM, NFC, PERIC, TOUCH pin banks and > > separate control for FSYS and AUD pin banks, for which PMU retention > > registers match whole banks. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski > > --- > > drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h | 16 ++++++++ I already have some non-conflicting changes to exynos-regs-pmu.h in my branch. Now I want to add some more which will create conflicts. How about splitting the header to separate patch, so I will take it to my exynos-pmu branch? Best regards, Krzysztof