From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: peter.senna@collabora.com (Peter Senna Tschudin) Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 15:16:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH V7 3/4] drm/bridge: Add driver for GE B850v3 LVDS/DP++ Bridge In-Reply-To: <759f96e2-43da-45ba-cf8d-55bc1f6e8442@codeaurora.org> References: <4232c88a99f44a24287d04d74b891e2eb139864c.1483301745.git.peter.senna@collabora.com> <759f96e2-43da-45ba-cf8d-55bc1f6e8442@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <20170128141646.GA21291@collabora.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 01:18:47PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote: Hi Archit, Thank you for the comments! [...] > > + total_size = (block[EDID_EXT_BLOCK_CNT] + 1) * EDID_LENGTH; > > + if (total_size > EDID_LENGTH) { > > + kfree(block); > > + block = kmalloc(total_size, GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!block) > > + return NULL; > > + > > + /* Yes, read the entire buffer, and do not skip the first > > + * EDID_LENGTH bytes. > > + */ > > Is this the reason why you aren't using drm_do_get_edid()? Yes, for some hw specific reason, it is necessary to read the entire EDID buffer starting from 0, not block by block. [...] I fixed all your other suggestions. Thank you!